The CESTAT allowed the appeal filed by the appellant against the ...

Demands quashed for lack of evidence on service recipients and consideration.

December 7, 2024

Case Laws Service Tax AT

The CESTAT allowed the appeal filed by the appellant against the demands raised for service tax on franchise service, maintenance or repair service, commercial training or coaching service, management or business consultant service, reimbursable expenses, and manpower recruitment and supply service. The Tribunal held that the appellant cannot be treated as a franchisee or representative of Aircom International Company, U.K., based on the terms of the agreement between them. Regarding the other services, the Tribunal found that the show cause notice lacked proper identification of service recipients, consideration paid, and reasoned grounds for demand, rendering the allegations unsubstantiated. Consequently, the demands along with interest and penalties were set aside.

View Source

← Previous Next →

The CESTAT allowed the appeal filed by the appellant against the ...

Demands quashed for lack of evidence on service recipients and consideration.

December 7, 2024

Case Laws Service Tax AT

You may also like:

When a service provider has already paid 100% service tax on manpower supply and security services, demanding the same service tax from the service recipient, who is...

Demand of differential service tax - Provider of GTA service - Whether the recipient of services were liable to pay ST on reverse charge basis (RCM) - all the service...

The appellant provides warranty services to customers who purchased machines from its parent company, receiving commission on sales. The appellant made provisions in its...

Service tax liability cannot be imposed twice on the same transaction. The appellant, as a service recipient, was required to pay 75% of the service tax under the...

Demand of service tax - reimbursement expenses - The appellant had agreed to pay a fixed monthly amount to HLL as a consideration for management services - The...

Appellant provided 'Intermediary' services classifiable as business auxiliary services within taxable territory to foreign recipients. Service Tax returns showed...

Demand of Service Tax - Reverse charge mechanism - import of services - As such it is not the liability of service recipient but the liability of service provider which...

Service tax demand on Goods Transport Agency (GTA) services rendered on reverse charge basis set aside as appellant did not collect service tax from service recipient....

The High Court held that the value of free diesel supplied by the service recipient to the Goods Transport Agency (GTA) service provider cannot be included in the...

Non-payment of Service tax - RCM - GTA Service or not - the demand has been raised upon the appellant alleging that they are the recipient of services of goods transport...

Supply of services - local services or export of services - services provided to the US Client directly - benefit of zero-rated - The statute is unambiguous in as much...

Nature of transaction - Classification of services - Supply of Tangible Goods Services or GTA Services - the same transaction could not be levied to service tax both at...

CESTAT, an Appellate Tribunal, addressed the issue of classifying services as either business auxiliary or legal services. The appellant provided Legal Consultancy...

Determination of the taxable value for payment of service tax on reverse charge basis by the service recipient in respect of Goods Transport Agency (GTA) Services. The...

Demand of Interest on 50% of the service tax - when the service provider (appellant) has paid entire 50% of the amount towards service tax and the service Recipient also...

Quick Updates: