The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) held that in ...

Determining arm's length price: Excluding functionally incomparable companies, including similar ones.

December 10, 2024

Case Laws Income Tax AT

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) held that in determining the arm's length price for transfer pricing adjustments, three companies (MOIAPL, LCAPL, and MOEPAPL) should be excluded from the comparable list as they were functionally not comparable to the assessee, following the binding order of the Coordinate Bench of ITAT, Mumbai. However, the ITAT directed the Transfer Pricing Officer/Assessing Officer to include three other companies (ICRA, Cyber, and ITIL) in the list of comparables and calculate the arm's length price accordingly, as they were functionally similar to the assessee, in line with the orders of the coordinate benches of ITAT-Mumbai.

View Source

← Previous Next →

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) held that in ...

Determining arm's length price: Excluding functionally incomparable companies, including similar ones.

December 10, 2024

Case Laws Income Tax AT

You may also like:

Transfer pricing adjustment made to alleged international transaction of AMP expenditure incurred by assessee disallowed due to lack of evidence that assessee agreed to...

Arm's Length Price adjustment on international transaction – selection of comparable - if abnormal loss making companies are excluded abnormal profit making companies...

If the Transfer Pricing Officer did not agree to the arm's length price shown by the assessee it was open for him to determine the arm's length price by applying one of...

Tribunal held that Vishal Information Technologies Ltd. and Nucleus Net soft & GIS (India) Ltd. should be excluded from comparable selection for determining arm's length...

TP Adjustment - valuation of Arms Length Price (ALP) - No Arm's Length Price is required to be determined for a transaction with specified persons in section 40A(2)(b)...

The case pertains to the levy of penalty u/s 271G for failure to furnish documents and information u/ss 92CA/92D. The key points are: The Transfer Pricing Officer (TPO)...

Transfer pricing adjustment regarding inclusion of E4e Healthcare as a comparable company. Assessee objected due to unavailability of annual report. However, objections...

The High Court upheld the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal's (ITAT) decision regarding the applicability of Section 92(3) in determining the arm's length price for...

Penalty u/s 271G - non–maintenance of documents which the assessee is required to maintain under the statutory provisions, the Transfer Pricing Officer found it...

Scrutiny by the High Court in an appeal u/s 260A for Determination of the arm’s length price made by the Tribunal - When the determination of the arm’s length price is...

The ITAT held that the Transfer Pricing Officer (TPO) should consider comparables dealing in electronic products only, supported by a technical expert's certificate,...

TP Adjustment - comparable selection - The ITAT that the turnover filter cannot be applied as a tool for cherry picking the comparables at the later stage after...

TPA - where the variation between the arm’s length price determined u/s 92C and the price at which the international transaction or specified domestic transaction has...

TP Adjustment - reimbursement of expenses - Determining the arms length price as NIL - the assessee has not been able to prove the actual rendering of...

TPA - the jurisdiction and power of TPO is to determine arm's length price of Royalty and the order of TPO holding that the assessee had not derived any benefit under...

Quick Updates: