Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Income Tax - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights December 2024 Year 2024 This

The ITAT decided in favor of the assessee, a doctor residing in ...


Tribunal accepts doctor's family cash gifts explanation, upholds tax on anonymous donations.

December 16, 2024

Case Laws     Income Tax     AT

The ITAT decided in favor of the assessee, a doctor residing in the United Kingdom. The unexplained cash deposits in the assessee's Indian bank account during the demonetization period were claimed to be gifts from the assessee's family members, who are doctors with substantial income in India. The Tribunal accepted the assessee's contention that the cash gifts could not be deposited at once due to difficulties during demonetization. The Assessing Officer failed to conduct further inquiries u/s 133(6)/131(1) to establish the identity, genuineness, and creditworthiness of the donors, despite the assessee furnishing gift certificates. The onus shifted to the Assessing Officer, who made assumptions without completing the inquiry process. Considering the family's status and income, the Tribunal found the explanation for cash gifts over three years justified. However, the Tribunal upheld the addition u/s 115BBE, as the assessee was aware of the nature of additions through the show cause notice, despite the Assessing Officer not mentioning the specific section.

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Addition u/s 68 - unexplained gifts received from family members - The Appellate Tribunal found that the assessee had provided sufficient evidence to establish the...

  2. The appellant could not establish the source for cash deposits during demonetization. The Appellate Tribunal held that sales cannot be rejected solely based on higher...

  3. The assessee's unexplained cash credits u/s 68 were deleted by the CIT(A) after accepting the submissions that the cash receipts from various sources like cash sales,...

  4. Cash deposit in bank account treated as unexplained income - Agricultural income or not? - The Tribunal found discrepancies in the appellant's claims regarding...

  5. Pharmaceutical companies’ gifting freebies to doctors, etc. - whether Allowable Business expenditure under Section 37(1)?

  6. Addition u/s 68 - ITAT confirmed the additions - The High Court upheld the Tribunal's decision, affirming the dismissal of the appeal. It concurred with the Tribunal's...

  7. Disallowance of gifts given to Doctors - business expenditure - it was necessary on the part of the assessee to provide complete details containing names, addresses of...

  8. Sections 132B, 140A, 153A and 234B of the Income Tax Act, 1961 were analyzed regarding adjustment of seized cash against tax liability. The appellants claimed that cash...

  9. This case pertains to the addition made u/s 69A of the Income Tax Act regarding unexplained cash found during a search operation. The assessee produced a cash book to...

  10. Addition u/s. 69A - unexplained cash deposits in the bank account - The Tribunal found the explanation provided by the assessee regarding the sale consideration for real...

  11. The assessee's investment in film financing business was examined based on seized documents and statements recorded during the search operation. The explanation that the...

  12. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal held that cash found in two lockers belonged to RNB Temple Trust and Ram Bajaj Foundation. The Trust's balance sheet showed cash in...

  13. Cash deposit during demonetization period treated as unexplained cash credit. Assessee's claim of introducing cash as capital in proprietary concern not accepted due to...

  14. Income Tax: Section 47(iii) of the Income Tax Act, which exempts transfers of capital assets under gift, will or irrevocable trust from capital gains tax, is proposed to...

  15. The High Court found that the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal's order regarding the source of cash gifts was perverse and failed to consider the available evidence. The...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates