In the matter under review, the High Court dismissed the review ...

Dismissal of Review Petitions: Court Upholds Interest Refund Order, Cites Procedural Lapses.

December 18, 2024

Case Laws GST HC

In the matter under review, the High Court dismissed the review petitions filed by the parties. The Court held that no grounds were established for seeking a review of the order directing the refund of interest amount. The Court observed that the insufficient time to check calculations during the initial proceedings cannot be a ground for review. Regarding a letter from January 2014, which the Review Petitioner admitted was not brought to the Court's notice earlier, the Court stated that while it can be relied upon in the enquiry to fix responsibility for non-renewal of FD, it does not warrant a review of the Court's order. Consequently, both review petitions were dismissed by the High Court.

View Source

← Previous Next →

In the matter under review, the High Court dismissed the review ...

Dismissal of Review Petitions: Court Upholds Interest Refund Order, Cites Procedural Lapses.

December 18, 2024

Case Laws GST HC

You may also like:

CENVAT credit - procedural lapses - whether credit of Cenvat taken on the basis of ISD Invoices issued by the Head Office of the appellant units is deniable for curable...

Performance review of Public Interest Directors (PIDs)

Confiscation - imported four Mercedes Benz cars - restricted goods or not - While recognizing the mandatory nature of the type approval certificate under Rule 126 CMVR,...

Export of services - Procedural lapse in submitting the proof of documents - Non-fulfilment of conditions prescribed in the N/N. 18/2009-ST - After hearing both sides,...

Levying penalty u/s. 272A(2)(k) - Filing the return belatedly - There may have been procedural lapse on the part of the assessee however, due to such procedural lapse no...

Penalty - The plea that substantial benefit should not be denied for procedural lapse is clearly not tenable as there is fraudulent availment of Cenvat credit without...

Rebate/ refund claim - case of appellant is that rebate claim cannot be rejected on the ground of procedural lapses such as non-payment under correct category, filing of...

The review petition challenges the order imposing interest liability over the withheld amount and cost on the Managing Director. The court held that reviewing an order...

The case involved the Appellate Tribunal addressing issues regarding the scope of Show Cause Notice (SCN) and compliance with Customs notifications. The Tribunal held...

CENVAT Credit - failure to distribute credit on certain common input services and transition to GST - It is only a procedural lapse and it will not affect the...

SEBI issued a circular on "Financial Disincentives for Surveillance Related Lapses" at Market Infrastructure Institutions (MIIs). MIIs play a crucial role in market...

Review petition - Levy of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Tribunal sustaining the levy without providing an opportunity of hearing - Review applicant had paid entire tax amount...

Frivolous review petition - Interest and cost to be recovered from the commissioner of customs in the review petition and all officers responsible.- HC

Dismissal of appeal - appeals have not been filed by a person authorized under Rule 3 of Customs Appeal Rules, 1982 - Appeal filed by CHA - procedural lapse or not -...

A review application is maintainable on (i) discovery of new and important evidence which could not be produced earlier despite due diligence, (ii) mistake or error...

Quick Updates: