The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)'s order deleting the penalty levied ...

Cash sales bills raised on different occasions can't be aggregated to allege Rs. 2 lakh cash receipt violation.

December 23, 2024

Case Laws Income Tax AT

The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)'s order deleting the penalty levied by the AO u/s 271DA for alleged violation of Section 269ST. The ITAT observed that the AO had aggregated different cash sales bills raised at different times by different sales executives, without establishing that the bills were raised for sales to a single person exceeding Rs. 2 lakhs in a day. The ITAT held that Section 269ST prohibits receiving cash of Rs. 2 lakhs or more from a single person in a single day, and the violation is connected with the payer's identity, which the AO failed to conclusively prove. The mere presumption of aggregate cash sales exceeding Rs. 2 lakhs was insufficient to establish a violation.

View Source

← Previous Next →

The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)'s order deleting the penalty levied ...

Cash sales bills raised on different occasions can't be aggregated to allege Rs. 2 lakh cash receipt violation.

December 23, 2024

Case Laws Income Tax AT

You may also like:

Addition u/s 69A - unexplained income - cash deposits made into bank account during demonetization period - assessee neither furnished stock summary nor bills/vouchers...

Rejection of declared transaction value under Valuation Rule 12, re-determination of value under Valuation Rules 4-9. Commissioner followed Rule 9, adopted actual values...

Contravention of Sections 8(1) and 9(1)(f)(i) of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973 - receiving foreign exchange payments in 1996-97 through fake export documents...

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal allowed the assessee's appeal against the reopening of assessment u/s 148A of the Income Tax Act. The Assessing Officer had alleged...

Cash transactions proposed to be capped at ₹ 2 lakh

Unexplained investment u/s 69 - cash deposit - the alleged transactions of cash deposits and corresponding entries of cheque issued were not in the nature of any...

The assessee, a sole proprietor running a petrol pump allotted by BPCL, deposited unexplained cash in the current bank account. The AO invoked Section 69A and made an...

In the case, ITAT decided on two main issues: 1. Addition on account of Gold and Silver Jewellery u/s 69A: Assessee disclosed Rs. 70,00,000 as unexplained investment...

Assessee was granted deduction u/s 54F as evidence of construction of residential house worth Rs. 1.25 crore on ancestral land using funds from sale of agricultural land...

100% penalty on cash transaction over ₹ 2 lakh (originally it was proposed as 3 lakh) from April 1, 2017 - Loksabha Passed the Finance Bill, 2017 today i.e. 22-3-2017

Applicability of TCS where the bill amount is exceeding ₹ 2 lakhs and when part of the bill is paid in cash and part through cheque - CBDT clarifies

Assessee, a partner in Daurau Farms LLP engaged in sale of farm fresh milk, paid Rs. 30 lakhs in three installments of Rs. 10 lakhs each to Mr. Deepak for purchasing...

Appellate Tribunal reduced penalty imposed on company u/s 50 of FERA, 1973 from Rs.2 crores to Rs.2.5 lakhs for contravention regarding two foreign exchange remittances...

The CESTAT disposed of the appeal with the following key holdings: Undervaluation relating to stock transfer to their own unit and sale to sister unit was held not...

Addition of fixed deposits and interest thereon in wife's name was deleted as the Revenue could not controvert that the deposits belonged to the assessee's wife from her...

Quick Updates: