Respondent no. 5 - M/s Adel Landmark Limited's application for ...

Landmark firm's plea for compounding tax offences rejected, HC allows fresh consideration.

December 24, 2024

Case Laws Income Tax HC

Respondent no. 5 - M/s Adel Landmark Limited's application for compounding offences u/s 276B and 278B was rejected as the competent authority [Chief CIT(TDS)] deemed petitioner's standalone application non-considerable. HC set aside the order, remanding to the competent authority to decide afresh per current guidelines, allowing co-accused to apply separately for compounding offences. Petition disposed accordingly.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Respondent no. 5 - M/s Adel Landmark Limited's application for ...

Landmark firm's plea for compounding tax offences rejected, HC allows fresh consideration.

December 24, 2024

Case Laws Income Tax HC

You may also like:

The High Court held that the Central Board of Direct Tax's Compounding Guidelines dated 16 September 2022, which rejected the application for compounding u/s 279(2) on...

Compounding of the offence committed for failure to pay the Tax Deducted at Source (TDS) - There is no limitation prescribed - Since the applications filed by the...

CIRP - Reimbursement of Compounding fees - Who is responsible for offence or compounding of offence under the Income Tax Act which was committed much before the...

The guidelines provide a comprehensive framework for compounding offenses under the Income Tax Act, 1961. The key points are: 1. Compounding is permissible for specified...

Validity of the order 278(2) - compounding of offence u/s 279(2) - Income Tax Authorities have the power to compound the offence either before or after the institution...

Service Tax (Compounding of Offences) Rules, 2012 - Notification

Compounding of offence(s) - determination of compounding fee - first occasion - 5% or 3% of the amount of tax in default - Since a common application had been filed for...

Compounding of offences u/s 279 - liberalisation of policy of the CBDT- applications for compounding of non-technical offences - imprisonment for less than 2 years was...

Compounding of offences u/s 279(2) - assessee had committed not one but multiple grave offences - There is no merits in this writ petition as petitioner has shown no...

Vicarious liability of partner of the firm - separate identity of partnership firm - merely the petitioner running a firm, but it is not a legal entity and it cannot be...

Compounding of offences u/s 276CC – it is for the assessee to show sufficient cause or reason to support his request for the compounding of the offence - HC

Compounding of offences and payment of compounding fee - there are no complaints and there is no inspection/investigation pending. - In the present case, the company has...

Compounding of offences - compounding application rejected due to delay in filing the application - just because the first application was rejected for default, does not...

Compounding of offences - KVAT Act - For compounding an offence, which of the compounding fees should be paid by the assessee: the one prevailing when the evasion took...

Smuggling - Gold - plea bargaining versus compounding of offences - The concept of plea bargaining was introduced in Indian criminal jurisprudence by way of amendment...

Quick Updates: