The ITAT held that the AO failed to conclusively establish that ...

Investing companies' identity can't be presumed non-existent for share capital addition.

December 31, 2024

Case Laws Income Tax AT

The ITAT held that the AO failed to conclusively establish that the investing companies were non-existent to invoke Section 68 for addition of share capital. Regarding Section 56(2)(viib) addition for share premium, the ITAT ruled that when an unquoted company opts for the Discounted Cash Flow valuation method u/r 11UA(2)(b), the AO cannot disregard it and substitute with another method, even if discrepancies exist in the assessee's workings. The assessee's appeal was allowed.

View Source

← Previous Next →

The ITAT held that the AO failed to conclusively establish that ...

Investing companies' identity can't be presumed non-existent for share capital addition.

December 31, 2024

Case Laws Income Tax AT

You may also like:

Addition u/s 68 - addition on account of share capital - the investor companies have withdrawn money from companies where funds were invested earlier and they invested...

Unexplained cash credit u/s 68 - share capital/share premium receipts - Despite substantial evidence provided by the appellant, including bank statements, share...

Unexplained share capital and premium received by assessee company was its own unaccounted money flowing back in form of premium on share allotment. Assessee filed...

Unexplained Income - addition u/s 68 - Receipt of share application money from group companies - group companies invest in each other - Double additions - In this case...

Addition u/s 68 - share capital and share premium - allegation regarding identity and creditworthiness - non appearance of director - addition cannot be sustained merely...

Reduction of share capital - Even though the public shareholders/non promotor shareholders had objected to the reduction of share capital in the EGH but the majority...

The assessee company received share capital and share application money from 13 share applicants. The Assessing Officer (AO) made an addition u/s 68, alleging that the...

Addition u/s 68 - genuineness of the transaction - share capital and share premium - identity and creditworthiness of the investors - the genuineness of the transaction...

Addition u/s. 68 - unexplained share capital and premium - the assessee company concealed its own identity, address as well as the identity and address of its directors....

Capital gain - transfer of a capital asset by assessee to its subsidiary company - There are different shareholders of preference share capital other than the holding...

Non-proving identity, creditworthiness, and genuineness of share premium received cannot be treated as unexplained income if sufficient documentary evidence is provided....

In a case concerning unexplained credit u/s 68, the assessee proved the identity and genuineness of share applicants, although their creditworthiness was questioned. The...

Addition u/s 68 - addition in share capital and share premium, identity and creditworthiness of the share holders, valuation report - Since no cash was involved in...

Reopening of assessment u/s 147 for addition u/s 68 on share premium received by petitioner from Gold Singapore was challenged. Reassessment proceedings initiated...

Addition u/s. 68 - satisfaction regarding the identity and creditworthiness of the 13 investors who have invested in the share capital of the assessee company and the...

Quick Updates: