The HC held that the Tribunal erred in exercising jurisdiction ...

Statutory Dues Like PF, ESIC Not Eligible for Rectification u/s 254(2).

December 31, 2024

Case Laws Income Tax HC

The HC held that the Tribunal erred in exercising jurisdiction u/s 254(2) to set aside the additions made by the AO regarding delayed payment of statutory dues like PF and ESIC amounts. This view was contrary to the SC's decision in Checkmate Services Pvt Ltd, which was rendered after the Tribunal's order. The HC agreed with the Tribunal's decision in ANI Integrated Services Ltd, which rejected the Revenue's application seeking rectification in light of Checkmate Services Pvt Ltd, considering the limited jurisdiction u/s 254(2) and Beghar Foundation.

View Source

← Previous Next →

The HC held that the Tribunal erred in exercising jurisdiction ...

Statutory Dues Like PF, ESIC Not Eligible for Rectification u/s 254(2).

December 31, 2024

Case Laws Income Tax HC

You may also like:

Rectification of mistake u/s. 254(2) - Scope of tribunal in rectification - review of the order passed by the Tribunal in the guise of rectification which is not...

Addition u/s 43B r.w.s 2(24)(x) - employees contribution towards PF and ESIC - Since the employees’ contribution toward PF was not deposited before due date in terms of...

The Tribunal held that in a case involving a requisition u/s 132A of the Act, the jurisdiction to complete the assessment is governed by the provisions of Section 153A....

Rectification of mistake u/s 254(2) – What assessee desires is review of the order passed on in the garb of rectification application - AT

Rectification u/s mistake u/s 254 - apparent mistake in the order of Tribunal warranting rectification - scope of section 254(2) is limited to rectification of mistake...

Rectification u/s 254 - non consideration of certain grounds - there is an inadvertent mistake by the Tribunal in not disposing of grounds no.2, 3 and 6, which comes...

Maintainability of the appeal u/s 260A before HC whereas the rectification application u/s 254(2) is pending before the ITAT - there are substantial questions of law to...

Rectification of mistake u/s 254(2) - mistake of making an incorrect statement by AR - Order of tribunal was passed relying statement - argument advanced by said counsel...

Rectification u/s 254(2) - one of ground was not disposed - since the appeal against the order of the Tribunal has already been admitted and a substantial question of...

Rectification u/s 254(2) - receipt from other advertisers towards sale of online ad space in Inida under AdWord Program is chargeable to tax as 'Royalty - issue is...

Rectification/ Recall of order u/s 254(2) - the assessee is merely seeking a review of the order of the Tribunal, which is not possible in these proceedings under S.254(2) - AT

Rectification of mistake u/s 254 - in the guise of rectification, the Revenue is seeking review of the order of Tribunal, which is beyond the scope of powers as...

Rectification u/s 254 - an order u/s. 254(2) only permits rectification of mistake apparent from record - by submitting elaborate arguments in the realm of review of the...

Tribunal held that an order passed following binding precedents cannot be recalled or reviewed based on a subsequent contrary judgment of a higher court. Once an order...

Rectification u/s 254 - non consideration of Tribunal decision in order which was referred and provided in paper book - an apparent error requiring necessary...

Quick Updates: