9911796707
|
Home
Issues Involved:
1. Whether Company Petition No. 41 of 1982 should be admitted. 2. Whether the affairs of Bhaskar Stoneware Pipes Pvt. Ltd. were conducted in a manner oppressive to the minority shareholders. 3. Whether the conduct of the company's affairs was prejudicial to the interests of the company. 4. Whether a prima facie case for invoking the just and equitable clause u/s 433(f) of the Companies Act, 1956, was made out. Summary: Issue 1: Admission of Company Petition No. 41 of 1982 The appeal concerns an order directing that a petition u/s 397, 398, and 433 of the Companies Act, 1956, be admitted while withholding citation until further orders. The court found sufficient grounds for admitting the petition based on the materials presented, indicating the need for further investigation into the allegations. Issue 2: Oppression of Minority Shareholders The petitioners alleged that the company, originally a partnership, was intended to operate under a mutual understanding among family members. The BNB group allegedly violated this understanding by acquiring shares from the RB group and issuing shares to a company in which only the BNB family held shares, thereby consolidating control. The court found a prima facie case of oppression, as the BNB group's actions appeared to breach the basic mutual understanding that underlay the company's formation. Issue 3: Prejudice to the Interests of the Company The petitioners alleged that the BNB group diverted company funds to support their concerns, provided company assets at nominal rent to their businesses, and misused company resources. Specific allegations included the company bearing overheads for other BNB group businesses and the managing directors drawing salaries exclusively from the company while serving other concerns. The court found these allegations sufficiently specific and not satisfactorily rebutted, indicating a prima facie case of prejudicial conduct. Issue 4: Just and Equitable Clause u/s 433(f) The court examined whether the company was essentially a partnership among family members, with an implied understanding of mutual trust and parity among the groups. The BNB group's actions, including the acquisition of shares and the issuance of new shares, were found to potentially breach this understanding. The court held that a prima facie case for invoking the just and equitable clause u/s 433(f) was made out, as the company's conduct could justify winding up if not rectified. Conclusion: The court dismissed the appeal, affirming the admission of the petition under sections 397, 398, and 433 of the Companies Act, 1956, for further investigation into the alleged oppressive and prejudicial conduct by the BNB group.
|
