2002 (2) TMI 845 - AT - Central Excise

Summary

Issues:
Revenue's appeal against Modvat credit under Rule 57Q for various goods.

Analysis:
1. The Commissioner (Appeals) allowed Modvat credit under Rule 57Q for several goods used in manufacturing the final product. The Revenue challenged this decision, arguing that the goods did not qualify as capital goods under Rule 57Q during the material period.
2. The Tribunal examined the grounds of appeal and the submissions from both sides. The Revenue relied on the overruled decision in CCE v. Shanmugaraja Spinning Mills Pvt. Ltd., which was later overturned by the Larger Bench in Jawahar Mills Ltd. The Tribunal noted that the Revenue failed to assess whether the goods could be considered capital goods under the pre-existing provisions of Explanation (1) to Rule 57Q(1) during the disputed period.
3. The Revenue also contested the acceptance of certain Tribunal decisions by the Commissioner (Appeals) and raised concerns about the application of Board's Circular No. 344/60/97-CX regarding Transformer oil. However, the Tribunal emphasized that the circular deems Transformer oil as an eligible input under Rule 57A and is binding on departmental authorities.
4. The Tribunal found that the goods in question were indeed used in the manufacturing process, with some items like Lightning Arrestors and MSW electrodes considered integral parts of specific equipment. As a result, Modvat credit was deemed admissible for Transformer oil as an input under Rule 57A and for the remaining items as capital goods under Rule 57Q.
5. Ultimately, the Tribunal rejected the Revenue's appeal, affirming the Commissioner (Appeals)' decision to allow Modvat credit for the mentioned goods. The Tribunal's detailed analysis and application of relevant legal precedents supported the conclusion that the goods qualified for the specified credits under the applicable rules.