9911796707
|
Home
Issues involved:
The issue involves the deletion of an addition made by the Assessing Officer under section 68 on account of unexplained gifts of Rs. 13 lakhs from unrelated NRIs. Summary: Facts: The assessee received two gifts in the relevant year, one of Rs. 5 lakhs from Dr. Vishwadarshi Jaiswal and another of Rs. 8 lakhs from S. Tajinder Singh, both from their NRE accounts. The Assessing Officer added Rs. 13 lakhs as unexplained gifts due to lack of relationship and failure to prove love and affection. CIT(A) Decision: The CIT(A) found that the assessee provided gift deeds, affidavits, NRE bank account copies, and donors' passports. No further enquiry was made by the Assessing Officer. CIT(A) held that the assessee discharged its onus, citing legal precedents and emphasizing that love and affection were not necessary for addition under section 68. Arguments: The revenue relied on the Assessing Officer's reasoning and a High Court decision, while the assessee cited High Court and Supreme Court decisions supporting the CIT(A)'s order. Tribunal's Decision: After considering both parties' arguments, the Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decision. It noted that the assessee proved the identity and capacity of the cash creditors, and the genuineness of the transaction. The Assessing Officer's limited enquiries and lack of evidence to disprove the assessee's submissions led the Tribunal to reject the revenue's appeal. The Tribunal emphasized that additions cannot be made on suspicion alone, and in this case, the genuineness of the donors and transactions was established. Conclusion: The Tribunal dismissed the revenue's appeal, affirming the CIT(A)'s decision to delete the addition of Rs. 13 lakhs.
|
