Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Central Excise Central Excise + AT Central Excise - 2002 (1) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2002 (1) TMI 992 - AT - Central Excise

Issues:
- Recognition of Modvat credit based on endorsed invoices under Rule 57G of the Central Excise Rules.

Analysis:
The case involved a dispute regarding the recognition of Modvat credit based on endorsed invoices under Rule 57G of the Central Excise Rules. The respondents, who were manufacturers of various products falling under specific chapter sub-headings of the Central Excise Tariff Act, had availed credit of duty paid on inputs using endorsed invoices. However, the Range Officer issued a show cause notice questioning the validity of the endorsed documents for availing Modvat credit. The respondents argued that there was no legal justification for denying the credit, citing a relevant case law. They also contended that any technical lapses should be condoned, and the credit should not be denied solely on technical grounds.

The Commissioner, in the original order, disagreed with the respondents' contentions partially, holding them ineligible to avail Modvat credit on certain amounts based on invoices addressed to other plants. However, for the remaining amounts, the Commissioner accepted their arguments and dropped the proceedings. Subsequently, the appeal was filed before the Commissioner (Appeals), who also addressed a similar issue and disposed of it through another order. The Revenue then appealed to the Tribunal, which upheld the Commissioner's decision based on precedent and the judgment in a specific case. The Revenue's further reference application was dismissed, leading to an appeal before the Hon'ble High Court of Judicature at Chennai.

In response to the High Court's directive, the Tribunal was tasked with drawing up a statement of facts and remitting the records for consideration. The Revenue submitted paper books, but no representation was made by the respondents. Ultimately, the Tribunal ordered the records to be remitted to the High Court for the appropriate bench to address the question raised. The case highlighted the importance of adherence to procedural requirements and the interpretation of relevant rules in determining the eligibility for Modvat credit based on endorsed invoices under Rule 57G of the Central Excise Rules.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates