Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Companies Law Companies Law + HC Companies Law - 2001 (7) TMI HC This

  • Login
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2001 (7) TMI 1184 - HC - Companies Law

Issues:
1. Non-compliance with payment terms by the purchaser.
2. Request for deferment of payment and repeated extensions granted by the Court.
3. Failure to deposit instalments and reasons provided by the purchaser.
4. Submission of cheque instead of bank draft for payment.
5. Consideration of reasons for non-compliance and decision on forfeiture of earnest money.

Analysis:
1. The judgment revolves around the non-compliance of the purchaser, Sri Prem Mohan Singh, with the payment terms set by the Court. Despite repeated extensions and accommodations, the purchaser failed to deposit the required amounts within the specified timelines, leading to a breach of the agreement.

2. The Court had granted multiple opportunities for the purchaser to defer payment and provided extensions for depositing instalments. However, the purchaser consistently failed to meet the deadlines, indicating a pattern of delaying tactics and taking advantage of the leniency offered by the Court.

3. The purchaser submitted a cheque instead of a bank draft for payment, which was not in accordance with the prescribed payment method. Despite being given additional time to rectify this discrepancy, the purchaser could not comply within the stipulated timeframe, further delaying the payment process.

4. Various reasons were presented by the purchaser for the non-compliance, including local law and order issues, security concerns, and challenges in obtaining financial assistance. However, the Court found these reasons to be lacking in genuineness and questioned the purchaser's intentions, especially considering his background and familiarity with the area.

5. Ultimately, the Court decided to cancel the acceptance of the tender due to the purchaser's persistent failure to meet payment obligations and forfeited the earnest money deposited. The Official Liquidator was instructed to submit a report for re-advertisement of the company's properties for sale, highlighting the consequences of the purchaser's non-compliance with the payment terms.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates