Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Customs Customs + AT Customs - 2003 (1) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2003 (1) TMI 577 - AT - Customs

Issues:
1. Illegal importation of Silk Yarn without payment of Customs Duty.
2. Confiscation of goods and imposition of penalties.
3. Appeal against the order of confiscation and penalties.

Issue 1: Illegal importation of Silk Yarn without payment of Customs Duty

The case involves the discovery of 27 bales of Raw Silk Yarn of foreign origin stored at a premises in Bangalore without payment of Customs Duty. The goods were transported by a company on behalf of another, and various documents were produced as evidence. The authorities issued a show cause notice and eventually ordered the confiscation of the goods, along with the appropriation of sale proceeds and imposition of penalties under the Customs Act, 1962.

Issue 2: Confiscation of goods and imposition of penalties

The Additional Commissioner ordered the confiscation of the goods and appropriated the sale proceeds under Section 111(d) of the Customs Act. Additionally, personal penalties were imposed on the involved companies under Section 112(a) of the Act. In the appeal filed by one of the companies, the Commissioner (Appeals) modified the order, directing the goods to be released on redemption fine and reducing the penalty amount.

Issue 3: Appeal against the order of confiscation and penalties

The appellant company challenged the order of the Commissioner (Appeals) based on various findings. The Commissioner had concluded that the goods were illegally imported and not those bought from a specific source. However, after a detailed examination of the transport documents and discrepancies found in the investigation, it was revealed that the lower authorities had inaccuracies in their findings. The appellate tribunal found that the onus of proving illegal importation and non-duty payment was on the Revenue Department, which they failed to establish satisfactorily. As a result, the order of confiscation, redemption fine, and penalties were set aside, allowing the appeal in favor of the appellant company.

This detailed analysis of the judgment highlights the issues related to illegal importation, confiscation of goods, and imposition of penalties, along with the subsequent appeal and the final decision of the appellate tribunal.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates