2002 (9) TMI 787 - HC - Central Excise

Writ jurisdiction - Maintainability of - Show cause notice stage - Tea - Excisability - Words and phrases - Interpretation of Statute

Issues Involved:
1. Levy of Central Excise Duty on tea in unit containers of 20 Kgs or more.
2. Legality of the order/direction dated 13th October 1998.
3. Validity of the show cause notices issued in November 1998.
4. Jurisdiction and authority of the Central Excise authorities to levy excise duty on bulk tea.

Detailed Analysis:

1. Levy of Central Excise Duty on Tea in Unit Containers of 20 Kgs or More:
The petitioners argued that there is no levy of excise duty on bulk tea removed in unit containers of tea chests or the like containing more than 20 Kgs of tea. The court examined the legislative history and the Finance Act, 1998, which amended the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. The amendment introduced an excise duty of 8% on tea put up in unit containers and bearing a brand name under sub-heading 0902.10, while other tea remained exempt. The court interpreted "brand name" as per the statutory definition, meaning a name or mark used in relation to a product for indicating a connection in trade. The court concluded that tea removed in tea chests or gunny bags with the name of the garden does not constitute a "brand name" and thus does not fall under the taxable category of "tea put up in unit containers with a brand name."

2. Legality of the Order/Direction Dated 13th October 1998:
The order dated 13th October 1998 issued by the Ministry of Commerce stated that the exemption on tea packed in unit containers containing more than 20 Kgs is applicable from the date of issue of the notification and is prospective in nature. The court found this order to be erroneous and quashed it, stating that there was no tax on bulk tea removed in tea chests or gunny bags, as it falls under the category of "other tea," which was exempt from excise duty.

3. Validity of the Show Cause Notices Issued in November 1998:
The show cause notices issued in November 1998 demanded excise duty on tea packed in unit containers and bearing a brand name for the period from 2nd June 1998 to 23rd June 1998. The court held these notices to be illegal and without jurisdiction, as the bulk tea removed in tea chests or gunny bags did not bear a brand name and thus was not subject to excise duty under the relevant statutory provisions.

4. Jurisdiction and Authority of the Central Excise Authorities:
The petitioners challenged the jurisdiction and authority of the Central Excise authorities to levy excise duty on bulk tea. The court examined Section 11A of the Central Excise Act, 1944, and concluded that the authorities had no power to levy excise duty on tea removed in unit containers of 20 Kgs or more without a brand name. The court emphasized that the legislative intent, as reflected in the Finance Minister's Budget Speech and the statutory language, was to impose excise duty only on packaged tea with a brand name, not on bulk tea.

Conclusion:
The court allowed the writ applications, quashing the order dated 13th October 1998 and the show cause notices issued in November 1998. The court held that there was no excise duty on bulk tea removed in tea chests or gunny bags containing more than 20 Kgs, as such tea does not bear a brand name and falls under the exempt category of "other tea."

← Previous Next →