HC upheld the penalty order for non-compliance with e-way bill ...

E-way Bill Violation: Invalid Documentation Leads to Penalty Confirmation for Goods Transportation Under GST Regulations

April 19, 2025

Case Laws GST HC

HC upheld the penalty order for non-compliance with e-way bill requirements under the Uttar Pradesh GST Act, 2017. The goods were intercepted on 19.01.2023 with invalid e-way bills: one bill was for a different vehicle than declared, and the other had expired prior to transportation. The Court followed precedential rulings establishing that absence of a valid e-way bill creates a rebuttable presumption of tax evasion. The petitioner failed to provide sufficient evidence to rebut this presumption. Consequently, the Court dismissed the petition, affirming the mandatory nature of e-way bill compliance post-01.04.2018 and sustaining the imposed penalty.

View Source

← Previous Next →

HC upheld the penalty order for non-compliance with e-way bill ...

E-way Bill Violation: Invalid Documentation Leads to Penalty Confirmation for Goods Transportation Under GST Regulations

April 19, 2025

Case Laws GST HC

You may also like:

Levy of penalties u/ss 122 and 129 of CGST/SGST Acts - expiry of e-way bill - mens rea in penalty imposition. Technically, violation of law by petitioner in transporting...

Levy of 200% penalty - Failure to renew e-Way Bill - The appellants should have done since the goods were sold in transit. Therefore, there is a violation had committed...

Challenge to penalty order u/s 129(1) of CGST Act for non-generation of Part-B of E-way bill. Petitioner accepted notice and paid Rs. 11,08,150 penalty voluntarily...

HC ruled that carrying a complete e-way bill is mandatory for goods transportation. The petitioner was found transporting goods without fully completing the e-way bill...

The High Court quashed penalty u/s E-Way Bill violation, classifying goods as ODC due to speed without intent to evade tax. Relying on precedent, mens rea is essential...

Non-generation of e-way bill during transportation of goods led to seizure order u/s 129(3) of GST Act, imposing penalty and interest. However, it was admitted that...

Levy of penalty - at the time of detention was that one of the E-Way Bills had expired - The High court held that mens rea to evade tax is essential for imposing...

Levy of Penalty u/s 129(3) of the Central Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017 - Errors in e-way bills - The Court emphasized that minor typographical errors in e-way bills,...

Seizure of goods - goods seized on the ground that U.P. e-way bill was not accompanying the goods - section 129(3) of UPGST Act - On close, scrutiny of the record...

Seizure order for detention of goods due to absence of State E-way Bill was challenged. The Court held that at the time of interception, the Central E-way Bill under GST...

Customs broker's license suspension case involving violations of Regulations 10(d) and 10(e) of Customs Brokers Licensing Regulations (CBLR), 2018. Gross mis-declaration...

Valuation of imported goods - LED panel - rejection of declared value - The impugned goods are not in breach of certification standards and the onus for disturbing the...

Customs Broker license revocation, security deposit forfeiture, and penalty imposition under Regulations 10(a), (d), (e), and (n) of CBLR challenged. Regulation 10(a)...

HC quashed proceedings initiated under Section 129(3) of UPGST Act 2017 regarding goods intercepted without state E-way bill. While tax invoice, Central E-way bill and...

Levy of penalty - non filling up of Part 'B' of the e-Way Bill - existence of mens rea or not The High Court referenced a specific case and highlighted that the issue of...

Quick Updates: