9911796707
|
Home
Issues:
Claim for payment of debt and interest by Official Liquidator from respondent. Analysis: Issue 1: Whether the applicant proved that the respondent owed a sum of Rs. 1,81,205 as on 1-10-1989 and is liable to pay Rs. 3,56,943 as claimed in the application? The Official Liquidator filed an application seeking payment from the respondent based on trade dealings with the applicant-company. The respondent denied any transactions with the applicant, claiming dealings were with a different company. The applicant relied on company records and statements of affairs to establish the debt. The respondent presented evidence of transactions with another company to refute the claim. The court examined the evidence, including witness testimonies and documents. The court found that the applicant failed to substantiate the claim with sufficient evidence. The court noted that mere entry in company records was not enough to prove the debt without further corroboration. As the applicant did not provide additional proof of the debt owed by the respondent, the court dismissed the application. Issue 2: What order to pass based on the findings? The court, after considering the contentions and evidence presented, decided to dismiss the application for payment by the respondent. The court concluded that the applicant did not meet the burden of proof required to establish the debt claim. Therefore, the court ruled in favor of the respondent, stating that there shall be no order as to costs. In conclusion, the court dismissed the application by the Official Liquidator seeking payment from the respondent due to insufficient evidence to prove the debt claimed.
|
