9911796707
|
Home
Issues:
Petitions under sections 391 and 394 of the Companies Act, 1956 for sanctioning the scheme of amalgamation. Detailed Analysis: 1. Scheme of Amalgamation: The petitions were filed to sanction the scheme of amalgamation under sections 391 and 394 of the Companies Act, 1956, along with relevant rules. The transferor company, engaged in poultry farming, sought to merge with the transferee company, both approving the scheme in resolutions passed on 23-12-2005. 2. Rationale for Amalgamation: The scheme aimed to synergize operations, improve utilization of resources, achieve economies of scale, enhance profitability, and secure additional capital on favorable terms. The proposed integration was expected to lead to a stronger organization and better financial returns for both companies. 3. Transfer of Assets and Liabilities: The scheme detailed the transfer of the transferor company's undertaking, assets, liabilities, and obligations to the transferee company. It ensured continuity of service for staff and employees, maintaining existing terms and conditions without any detriment. 4. Equity Share Allotment: The scheme outlined the issuance of 4,00,000 equity shares of the transferee company to shareholders of the transferor company at a specified ratio, ensuring parity in rights with existing shareholders. The transferee company was required to increase its authorized share capital to accommodate the new shares. 5. Consent and No Objection: The court dispensed with shareholder meetings for both companies after considering consent affidavits and no objection letters from secured creditors. The Regional Director's report highlighted the need for the transferee company to comply with statutory provisions regarding authorized capital increase. 6. Objections and Counter-Arguments: The Regional Director raised concerns regarding the authorized capital increase and legal entities of the merging companies. However, the court overruled these objections, citing precedents and the scheme's compliance with statutory requirements. 7. Approval and Dissolution: The court sanctioned the scheme of amalgamation, effective from 1-10-2005, as it met all legal requirements, protected employee interests, and was fair, just, and compliant with statutory provisions. The transferor company was directed for dissolution without winding up, and the Additional Central Government Standing Counsel was awarded a fee. In conclusion, the judgment approved the scheme of amalgamation between the transferor and transferee companies, ensuring compliance with legal provisions, protection of employee interests, and fair treatment of stakeholders involved.
|
