9911796707
|
Home
Issues Involved:
1. Whether the technical licence fee payable by the appellant is related to the imported goods. 2. Whether the technical licence fee, which has not yet been paid, is addable to the transaction value under Rule 9(1)(c) of the Customs Valuation Rules, 1988. Issue-wise Detailed Analysis: 1. Relationship of Technical Licence Fee to Imported Goods: The appellant, a joint venture company, was importing unpolished cookware components and subjecting them to various processes at their Bangalore unit. They entered into a consultancy agreement with AMC International Alfa Metal Craft Corporation AG, Switzerland, for technical know-how, which included a lumpsum payment of DEM 2 million and a royalty payment. However, the project envisaged under this agreement, which involved the construction of a manufacturing plant and the completion of the manufacturing process, had not started. The appellant continued the manufacturing process acquired from Classic Cookware Pvt. Ltd. The adjudicating authority initially held that the technical know-how fee should be added to the transaction value. However, the Commissioner (Appeals) later found that the fee had no relation to the imported goods and was instead related to the goods to be manufactured pursuant to the agreement. This finding was challenged by the Revenue, leading to a remand by the Tribunal for de novo consideration, where the Commissioner (Appeals) again held that the technical know-how fee was related to the imports. 2. Addability of Technical Licence Fee to Transaction Value: The adjudicating authority initially rejected the transaction value under Rule 4(2)(c) of the Customs Valuation Rules, 1988, and added the technical know-how fee for determining the value of the imported goods. The Commissioner (Appeals), upon remand, concluded that the technical information provided under the agreement was related to the imports and thus addable to the declared value under Rule 9(1)(c). However, the Tribunal found that the technical know-how agreement had not come into force during the period of import in question and that the project envisaged under the agreement had not started. The Tribunal concluded that the imports were not related to the technical know-how agreement and thus the provisions of Rule 9(1)(c) were not applicable. Consequently, the order to add the technical know-how fee to the transaction value was set aside, and the appeal was allowed. Conclusion: The Tribunal concluded that the technical licence fee payable under the agreement was not related to the imported goods. The project envisaged under the agreement had not started, and the appellant continued the manufacturing process acquired from Classic Cookware Pvt. Ltd. Therefore, the technical know-how fee was not addable to the transaction value under Rule 9(1)(c) of the Customs Valuation Rules, 1988. The appeal was allowed, and the order impugned was set aside.
|
