9911796707
|
Home
Issues: Correct classification of imported goods "Refurbished Stacker Modules with Accessories" under Customs Tariff Act.
Analysis: 1. The appeal questioned the classification of the imported goods as "Stacker Modules (Storage Bins) for Cheque Sorting Machine" under CTH 8473.40 by the authorities, while the appellant argued for classification under CTH 8473.50 as parts and accessories suitable for use with machines of specific headings. The appellant contended that the imported machine functioned as a Magnetic Reader under CTH 8471.60, not akin to a Letter Sorting Machine under CTH 8472.30, supported by technical specifications and the Reserve Bank's letter. 2. The appellant's counsel emphasized the technical capabilities of the machine, highlighting its function as a Magnetic Reader for MICR characters, correctly classifiable under CTH 8471.60. The appellant disputed the department's classification under CTH 8472.90, asserting the machine's compatibility with machines of Heading Nos. 84.69 to 84.72, as per HSN Note. The counsel argued that the machine's features and functions aligned with the classification sought under CTH 8473.50. 3. The JCDR supported the department's classification under CTH 8472.30 for parts of documentation centers, considering the machine's role in sorting cheques akin to a letter-sorting machine. Referring to HSN Explanatory Notes, the JCDR argued that the machine's nomenclature and function placed it under Chapter Heading 8472 for office machines, not under CTH 8471. The JCDR rejected the appellant's claim under CTH 8473.50, citing the item's lack of compatibility with machines of Heading Nos. 84.69 to 84.72. 4. The Tribunal analyzed the technical literature, HSN Notes, and departmental classification, concluding that the imported item functioned as an Automatic Banknote Dispenser under CTH 8472.90, not as a machine for sorting or folding mail under CTH 8472.30 as contended by the appellant. The Tribunal upheld the department's classification, dismissing the appellant's claims under CTH 8473.50 and 8471.60, as the item's function and compatibility did not align with the headings specified. The Tribunal found no merit in the appeal and rejected it based on the correct classification of the imported goods under the Customs Tariff Act.
|
