9911796707
|
Home
Issues:
1. Disallowance of remission of duty under Section 23 of the Customs Act for shortage of imported goods. Analysis: The case involved the import of RBD Palmolien by the appellants, who had a shortage of 51.971 MTs out of the total quantity imported. The appellants claimed remission of duty on this quantity under Section 23 of the Customs Act, which was initially disallowed by the Original Authority and the first appellate authority, leading to the appeal. Upon examination of the records and submissions, it was found that the shortage was less than 0.58% of the total quantity as per the alleged Survey Report. The appellants explained the loss by stating that it occurred during the handling of the goods, which involved multiple transactions such as sale, transfer between tanks, and re-export in different vessels on various dates. The Assistant Commissioner of Customs also acknowledged the difficulty in pinpointing the exact quantity of loss due to the complex handling process. The Tribunal, after reviewing Section 23 of the Customs Act, noted that the loss of goods imported as liquid cargo, except by pilferage, is a valid reason for remission of duty. Given that the authorities themselves estimated the loss at 0.58% only and considering the reasonable explanation provided by the appellants for the loss, the Tribunal concluded that the party was eligible for remission under Section 23. Consequently, the impugned order disallowing the remission was set aside, and the appeal was allowed with any consequential reliefs that may apply. In conclusion, the Tribunal granted the appellants relief by allowing the remission of duty on the shortage of imported goods, emphasizing the reasonable explanation provided for the loss and the applicability of Section 23 of the Customs Act in such circumstances.
|
