2002 (10) TMI 22 - HC - Income Tax

The appellant had applied before the Commissioner of Income-tax for waiver/reduction of the interest levied under section 215 which was declined. In the above circumstances, there is no question of filing any appeal against the order giving effect to the directions issued by the Commissioner in the revision order for the very same relief. The Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) had no jurisdiction to entertain such an appeal. We do not find any merit in this appeal. It is accordingly dismissed.

Summary

Issues:
Assessment of interest under sections 139(8) and 215 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 for the year 1986-87; Appeal for waiver of interest under section 139(8) and section 215; Jurisdiction of the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) and Assessing Officer in granting relief; Legality of appeal against the levy of interest under section 215; Interpretation of relevant provisions and rules; Compliance with directions by the Commissioner of Income-tax.

Analysis:
The case involves a company engaged in the manufacture of centrifuged latex appealing against the assessment of interest under sections 139(8) and 215 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 for the year 1986-87. Initially, the Assessing Officer levied interest amounts which were later modified by the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) and further by the Commissioner under section 264 of the Act. The appellant sought waiver of interest under both sections, with the Commissioner waiving interest under section 139(8) but declining waiver for interest under section 215.

The main contention arose regarding the jurisdiction of the authorities in granting relief and the legality of appealing against the levy of interest under section 215. The appellant argued that the Tribunal erred in holding that no appeal lies against the interest levied under section 215, citing relevant case laws to support their position. However, the Revenue's counsel maintained that the appellant admitted liability by filing a petition under section 264 and that the Assessing Officer had no jurisdiction to reconsider the interest under section 215 after the Commissioner's decision.

The High Court found that the Commissioner had explicitly declined relief for interest under section 215 despite directions to verify and quantify the interest. The Court held that the first appellate authority erred in directing the Assessing Officer to waive the interest under section 215, as the Commissioner's decision stood. Consequently, the Tribunal's decision to cancel the first appellate authority's order was upheld, emphasizing that no appeal lies against the Assessing Officer's decision following the Commissioner's directive.

In conclusion, the Court dismissed the appeal, stating that the Commissioner's decision on waiver of interest under section 215 was final, and there was no basis for further appeal. The Court rejected the relevance of the cited case laws and affirmed the Tribunal's decision on the jurisdiction and legality of the appeal process in this context.