2002 (1) TMI 7 - HC - Income Tax

Duty Of Tribunal - Income Tax (Appellate Tribunal) Rules, 1963 - The substantial question sought to be raised in this appeal is as to when an issue was vaguely taken in the grounds of appeal, but argued specifically at the time of the final hearing of the appeal, can the Tribunal refuse to adjudicate upon that issue on the merits on the ground that no such ground has been taken specifically in the grounds of appeal? - we are of the opinion that it would be just and proper to permit the assessee to raise a specific plea regarding the addition of Rs. 8,94,039 as undisclosed income as an additional ground before the Tribunal and the Tribunal should decide the same issue on its own merits. - In this view of the matter, we set aside the judgment of the Tribunal in so far as it pertains to refusal on the part of the Tribunal to adjudicate the issue pertaining to the addition of Rs. 8,94,039 as undisclosed income and remit the matter back with a direction to the Tribunal to decide the issue in accordance with law on the merits

Summary

Issues:
1. Refusal of the Tribunal to adjudicate on a specific issue raised during the final hearing of the appeal.

Analysis:
The judgment pertains to an appeal before the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) where the assessee challenged the assessment order for the block period April 1, 1985, to March 20, 1996. The assessee specifically raised objections to the addition of Rs. 8,94,039 as undisclosed income during the final hearing of the appeal before the Tribunal. However, the Tribunal declined to adjudicate on this issue, citing that the ground was not specifically raised in the grounds of appeal or memorandum of appeal, nor was Rule 11 of the Appellate Tribunal Rules invoked.

Upon hearing the rival submissions, the High Court observed that the Tribunal erred in refusing to consider the issue raised by the assessee during the final hearing. The Court held that when an issue is allowed to be debated by the Tribunal, it cannot decline consideration thereof. The Court noted that although the ground was raised vaguely in the appeal, the assessee should not be denied the right to claim adjudication on the merits, especially when the issue was specifically taken up during the final hearing and both parties had the opportunity to address it.

The High Court emphasized that while it is necessary for an assessee to raise specific grounds in the memo of appeal, in this case, the issue was not completely absent as it was discussed during the final hearing. Therefore, the Court directed the Tribunal to permit the assessee to raise a specific plea regarding the addition of Rs. 8,94,039 as undisclosed income as an additional ground and to decide the issue on its merits. The judgment set aside the Tribunal's decision to refuse adjudication on this issue and remitted the matter back to the Tribunal for a fresh decision in accordance with the law, providing the assessee with a reasonable opportunity to make necessary amendments to the memo of appeal.

In conclusion, the High Court allowed the appeal, overturning the Tribunal's decision, and directed a reevaluation of the issue regarding the undisclosed income addition. The judgment highlighted the importance of allowing parties to present their arguments on specific issues raised during the final hearing of an appeal, even if not explicitly stated in the initial grounds of appeal.