9911796707
|
Home
Issues:
- Whether the loss from share trading activities should be treated as business loss or speculation loss. - Whether the assessee qualifies as a trading company or investment company. - Whether the Badla income should be considered as interest income or share dealing income for set off against losses. Analysis: 1. Assessment year 1994-95: - The Assessing Officer determined that the assessee primarily dealt in shares and securities, considering it a trading company, not an investment company. The loss from share dealings was disallowed under Explanation to section 73. The assessee argued that its main income source was interest on loans, including Badla transactions, exceeding other income. The CIT(A) allowed the claim, stating Badla income arose from lending operations, making the loss outside section 73's purview. - The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decision, emphasizing Badla transactions as interest income from loans and advances. The Institute of Chartered Accountants opined Badla should be accounted for as income from loans and advances, supporting the assessee's position. The Tribunal found no reason to interfere with the CIT(A)'s order, dismissing the revenue's appeal. 2. Assessment year 1995-96: - The facts for this year were similar to the previous year. The revenue's appeal for this assessment year also failed and was dismissed. - The Tribunal upheld the decisions made for the assessment year 1994-95, leading to the dismissal of the revenue's appeal for the subsequent year. In conclusion, the Tribunal affirmed that the Badla income should be treated as interest income from loans and advances, supporting the assessee's claim that the loss from share trading activities was not speculation loss but a business loss. The revenue's appeals for both assessment years were dismissed based on the above analysis.
|
