Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + AT Income Tax - 2005 (6) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2005 (6) TMI 506 - AT - Income Tax

Issues:
1. Validity of reopening of assessment under section 147 after more than four years from the end of the relevant assessment year.
2. Disallowance of interest amounting to Rs. 9,32,603.

Analysis:
1. Validity of Reopening of Assessment:
The appeal before the Appellate Tribunal concerned the validity of reopening the assessment for the assessment year 1996-97 under section 147 after more than four years from the end of the relevant assessment year. The assessee challenged the reopening on the grounds that there was no failure on their part to disclose fully and truly all material facts necessary for assessment. The Assessing Officer had reopened the assessment based on the assertion that the assessee had advanced interest-free amounts to a related entity, resulting in under-assessment. However, it was noted that the balance sheet and profit and loss account submitted during the original assessment clearly showed the transactions in question. The Tribunal held that since the necessary facts were already on record and there was no failure to disclose, the reopening of assessment was not justified. Consequently, the Tribunal quashed the reopening of assessment under section 147 and restored the original assessment order under section 143(3) dated 4-2-1999.

2. Disallowance of Interest:
The revenue had raised an appeal against the deletion of the disallowance of interest amounting to Rs. 9,32,603. The Assessing Officer disallowed the interest deduction on the grounds that borrowed funds were not utilized for business purposes and interest expenditure was not allowable. However, since the reassessment itself was quashed by the Tribunal, the revenue's appeal became infructuous, and the deletion of the disallowance stood. The Tribunal allowed the assessee's cross objection and dismissed the revenue's appeal.

In conclusion, the Appellate Tribunal held that the reopening of assessment under section 147 was not justified due to the absence of any failure on the part of the assessee to disclose material facts. The Tribunal quashed the reassessment, leading to the dismissal of the revenue's appeal regarding the disallowance of interest.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates