Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Central Excise Central Excise + AT Central Excise - 2006 (1) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2006 (1) TMI 519 - AT - Central Excise

Issues:
Appeal for re-processing of BIS Sugar, duty demand due to alleged sugar losses, validity of duty payment for standard sugar and molasses obtained after re-processing.

Analysis:
In the present case, the issue revolved around the re-processing of BIS Sugar by the appellants to obtain standard sugar and molasses, leading to a duty demand by the department due to alleged sugar losses during the process. The appellants argued that the standard sugar and molasses obtained after re-processing were duly cleared on payment of duty, with no accusations of non-accountal or illicit clearance. The Tribunal carefully considered the submissions and found that the re-processed standard sugar and molasses were properly accounted for by the appellants. Notably, there was no evidence of any illicit removal of standard sugar and molasses. This finding was supported by previous decisions of the Tribunal in similar cases, leading to the conclusion that the appeals had merit. Consequently, the order of the Commissioner (Appeals) was set aside, and the appeals were allowed, favoring the appellants. The judgment was delivered on 9-1-2006 by Shri K.C. Mamgain, J.

Conclusion:
The judgment by the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, New Delhi, in the appeals concerning the re-processing of BIS Sugar and duty demand for alleged sugar losses highlighted the importance of proper duty payment for standard sugar and molasses obtained after re-processing. The decision emphasized the need for accurate accountal of processed products and the absence of any illicit activities in the clearance process. The Tribunal's reliance on previous rulings in similar cases reinforced the validity of the appellants' claims, leading to the setting aside of the Commissioner (Appeals) order and the allowance of the appeals.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates