9911796707
|
Home
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2007 (9) TMI 456 - AT - Income TaxComputation of capital gains - sold manufacturing unit on slump sales basis as a going concern - Determination of cost of acquisition - Net worth of an assessee is negative - Disallowance of expenditure u/s 37 - Manufacturing and Sale of stationery item and trading activities HELD THAT - Respectfully following the decision in the case of Zuari Industries Ltd. v. Asstt. CIT 2006 (6) TMI 136 - ITAT BOMBAY-E held that in case of slump sale, where the liabilities are more than the value of assets, the net worth, viz. , the cost of acquisition has to be taken at nil and entire sale consideration is liable to capital gains. Therefore, we also set aside the orders of tax authorities below on the first issue involved in the grounds of instant appeal of the assessee under consideration before us and the same is decided against the revenue and in favour of the assessee and accordingly ground of appeal of the assessee in this regard pertaining to this issue are allowed. Disallowance of expenditure u/s 37 - Incurred on Commercial Expediency - HELD THAT - On going through the order of the CIT(A), we find that before recording a finding that the expenditure was not incurred for the business purpose of the assessee the CIT(A) has not allowed an opportunity to the assessee for explaining as to how the expenditure related to the business expediency of the assessee. We find force in the contention of the learned AR for the assessee that once the assessee has filed the complete details of the expenditure nothing more was required to be done by the assessee for showing its eligibility for claiming the deduction for the impugned expenditure and, therefore, the assessee did not consider it necessary to explain the same before the CIT(A). Had the CIT(A) asked the assessee to explain the assessee would have done so. We consider it appropriate to set aside the issue to the file of the CIT(A) for deciding the issue afresh after allowing reasonable opportunity of being heard to the assessee for explaining as to how the expenditure incurred/claimed related to the commercial expediency of the assessee. The CIT(A) shall also allow opportunity of being heard to the Assessing Officer. With these observations, the order of the CIT(A) in this regard is set aside and the issue of claim of deduction u/s 37 of the Act of the expenditure incurred by the assessee is restored to the file of the CIT(A) for compliance. The Ground No. 2 of the appeal of the assessee stands allowed for statistical purpose. In the result, the appeal of the assessee stands partly allowed for statistical purpose.
Issues Involved:
1. Determination of long-term capital gains. 2. Deduction of expenses claimed for a study on marketing and distribution. Issue-wise Detailed Analysis: 1. Determination of Long-term Capital Gains: The assessee sold its manufacturing unit at Navi Mumbai on a slump sale basis for Rs. 75 lakhs. The Assessing Officer (AO) determined the net worth of the assessee as a negative figure of Rs. 2,11,27,260, as liabilities exceeded assets. The AO calculated long-term capital gains at Rs. 2,86,27,260, considering the extinguishment of liabilities worth Rs. 5,11,17,260. The CIT(A) upheld this determination, treating the extinguishment of liabilities as part of the sale consideration, resulting in a net worth of Rs. 2,99,90,000 and capital gains of Rs. 2,86,27,260. The Tribunal referred to the decision in Zuari Industries Ltd. v. Asstt. CIT [2006] 9 SOT 563, where it was held that in case of slump sale with liabilities exceeding assets, the net worth should be taken as nil, and the entire sale consideration is liable to capital gains tax. The Tribunal noted that capital gains cannot exceed the sale consideration and the net worth should be considered nil if liabilities exceed assets. Respecting judicial discipline and consistency, the Tribunal set aside the orders of the tax authorities on this issue, deciding in favor of the assessee. 2. Deduction of Expenses for Study on Marketing and Distribution: The assessee claimed expenses of Rs. 3,22,30,015 for a study conducted by its holding company, Ballarpur Industries Ltd., to explore new markets. The AO disallowed the expenses, treating them as capital expenditure since the assessee had already sold its manufacturing unit. The CIT(A) analyzed the expenses, finding that many bills related to travel, training, and other activities of Ballarpur Industries' senior officers, not directly linked to the market study. The CIT(A) concluded that the expenses were diverted to the assessee's account to offset capital gains from the slump sale and treated the expenditure as bogus. The Tribunal examined the arguments and noted that the CIT(A) did not allow the assessee an opportunity to explain the commercial expediency of the expenses. The Tribunal emphasized that for claiming expenditure under section 37, the assessee must establish a nexus between the expenditure and business purpose. The Tribunal found that the CIT(A) had not provided the assessee with a chance to justify the expenses and set aside the CIT(A)'s order on this issue. The Tribunal remanded the matter to the CIT(A) for fresh consideration, allowing the assessee to explain the commercial expediency of the expenses. Conclusion: The appeal was partly allowed for statistical purposes. The Tribunal set aside the orders of the tax authorities on the determination of long-term capital gains, deciding in favor of the assessee. The issue of deduction of expenses was remanded to the CIT(A) for fresh consideration, providing the assessee an opportunity to explain the commercial expediency of the claimed expenses.
|
