9911796707
|
Home
Issues:
Claim of depreciation on machinery and related expenses disallowed by CIT(A) under section 143(3) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 for assessment year 2001-02. Analysis: The appeal was filed against the CIT(A)'s order declining depreciation in respect of machinery and related expenses claimed by the assessee. The Assessing Officer disallowed depreciation on the machinery and related expenses after scrutiny assessment proceedings. The Assessing Officer recalculated the value of the machinery at Rs. 8,43,402 instead of the claimed Rs. 12,49,000. The CIT(A) upheld the Assessing Officer's decision, leading the assessee to further appeal. Upon hearing both parties and examining the material on record, the Tribunal found that the assessee had paid for the machinery and the machine was sold to the assessee shortly thereafter. The machine reached Mumbai on a specific date, and based on the evidence provided, the Tribunal concluded that the claim for depreciation on the printing machinery was valid. The Tribunal disagreed with the lower authorities' valuation of the machinery at Rs. 7,95,600, stating that the purchase price of Rs. 11,28,400 should be considered for depreciation calculation. Regarding the disallowance of capitalized expenses, the Tribunal noted that the disallowance of installation charges was unjustified, and thus directed the Assessing Officer to recompute the depreciable value of the machinery and grant depreciation accordingly. The Tribunal allowed the appeal, upholding the claim for depreciation on the printing machinery at the purchase price of Rs. 11,28,400 and deleting the disallowance of installation charges. In conclusion, the Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, directing the Assessing Officer to allow proper depreciation on the printing machinery purchased by the assessee at the actual purchase price of Rs. 11,28,400 and deleting the disallowance of installation charges while confirming the remaining disallowance due to lack of details.
|
