9911796707
|
Home
Issues:
Confiscation of photocopier machines due to mis-declaration of value, imposition of redemption fine and penalty, reduction of fine and penalty by lower appellate authority, reliance on VAT paid sale bills, consideration of demurrage/detention charges, enhancement of fine by appellate tribunal, quantum of penalty. Analysis: The case involved the confiscation of 100 old and used photocopier machines due to mis-declaration of value, leading to the enhancement of value by the authorities from Rs. 9,13,934/- to Rs. 14,25,110/- based on a market inquiry. The adjudicating authority imposed a redemption fine of Rs. 7,60,000/- and a penalty of Rs. 50,000/-, which was reduced by the Commissioner (Appeals) to Rs. 1,00,000/- and Rs. 20,000/- respectively. The Revenue appealed against this reduction in the quantum of fine and penalty. Upon review, the appellate tribunal noted that the lower appellate authority had relied on VAT paid sale bills/invoices of similar items to determine the market value of the photocopier machines. However, the tribunal found merit in the Revenue's argument that the value of old and used goods cannot be equated with new items, as wear and tear impact their value. The tribunal also considered demurrage/detention charges incurred by importers in such cases. The tribunal held that the reduction in fine based on the value from VAT paid sale bills was not justified and enhanced the fine to Rs. 4,00,000/-. Regarding the penalty, the tribunal found no reason to interfere with the reduced penalty of Rs. 20,000/- from the initial Rs. 50,000/-. The tribunal concluded by partly allowing the appeal, enhancing the fine imposed on the importers to meet the ends of justice while maintaining the penalty at the reduced amount. In summary, the appellate tribunal overturned the reduction in fine and penalty by the lower appellate authority, considering the unique value assessment required for old and used goods, and factoring in demurrage/detention charges to arrive at a fair quantum of fine. The tribunal enhanced the fine to Rs. 4,00,000/- while leaving the penalty unchanged at Rs. 20,000/-.
|
