2005 (7) TMI 606 - HC - VAT and Sales Tax

SALE IN COURSE OF IMPORT IMPORT OF GOODS AGAINST LETTER OF CREDIT BANK UPON RECEIPT OF PRICE OF GOODS FROM IMPORTER ISSUING LETTER OF DELIVERY TO CLEARING AGENT IMPORTER ENDORSING LETTER OF DELIVERY TO ITS CUSTOMER AND CUSTOMER OBTAINING DELIVERY UPON PAYMENT OF CUSTOMS DUTY AND OTHER CHARGES LETTER OF DELIVERY ISSUED BY BANK IS DOCUMENT OF TITLE SALE BY IMPORTER BY ENDORSEMENT THEREOF IS BEFORE GOODS CROSSED CUSTOMS BARRIER AND IN COURSE OF IMPORT

Summary

Issues Involved:
1. Interpretation of section 2(4) of the Sale of Goods Act regarding delivery orders as documents of title to goods.
2. Interpretation of section 5(2) of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 concerning the sale effected by transfer of documents of title before goods crossed the customs frontier of India.

Detailed Analysis:

I. Interpretation of Section 2(4) of the Sale of Goods Act:

The primary issue was whether delivery orders issued by bankers in pursuance of airways bills are considered documents of title to the goods and whether they are negotiable. The respondents, in various cases, contended that these delivery orders were indeed documents of title, allowing them to transfer goods before crossing the customs frontiers of India.

In the case of *Commissioner of Sales Tax v. B.M. Shah and Company*, the Sales Tax Tribunal held that the letter issued by Grindlays Bank was a delivery order, a document of title to the goods, and the sale had taken place before crossing the customs barrier of India. Similarly, in *Commissioner of Sales Tax v. Crystaline Corporation*, the Tribunal ruled that the delivery orders issued by Canara Bank were documents of title to the goods and negotiable.

The Supreme Court's judgment in *Bayyana Bhimayya & Sukhdevi Rathi v. Government of Andhra Pradesh* was cited, which stated, "A delivery order is a document of title to goods and the possessor of such a document has the right not only to receive the goods but also to transfer it to another by endorsement or delivery."

II. Interpretation of Section 5(2) of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956:

The second issue revolved around whether the sales were effected by transfer of documents of title to the goods before crossing the customs frontier of India, thus qualifying for exemption under section 5(2) of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956.

In *Commissioner of Sales Tax v. K. Mohan & Co.*, the Tribunal held that the letter issued by the State Bank of India was a delivery order, and the sale took place before the goods crossed the customs frontiers of India. Similarly, in *Commissioner of Sales Tax v. G. Rasul & Company*, the Tribunal set aside the Deputy Commissioner's order and reduced the penalty, recognizing the sales as occurring in the course of import.

The Tribunal's decisions were supported by the Supreme Court's judgment in *J.V. Gokal & Co. (Private) Ltd. v. Assistant Collector of Sales Tax (Inspection)*, which clarified that a sale by an importer of goods, after the property in the goods passed to him, to a third party by a similar process is also a sale in the course of import.

Conclusion:

The High Court concluded that the Sales Tax Tribunal was justified in its findings. The Tribunal's interpretation of delivery orders as documents of title to the goods and the subsequent sales occurring before the goods crossed the customs frontiers of India were upheld. The High Court answered both questions in the affirmative, in favor of the assessee and against the Revenue, confirming that such sales were exempt from sales tax under section 5(2) of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956. The references were disposed of accordingly, with no order as to costs.