9911796707
|
Home
Issues:
Interpretation of the Income-tax Act, 1961 regarding the deduction of interest paid by an association of persons on a loan obtained from a bank for meeting withdrawals of funds by the association members. Analysis: The judgment by the High Court of Delhi involved three reference applications concerning the deduction of interest paid by an association of persons on a loan obtained from a bank. The primary question referred to the court was whether the interest paid by the association on the loan for meeting withdrawals of funds by its members was an admissible deduction from the interest income of the association assessable under section 56 for the assessment years 1973-74, 1974-75, and 1975-76. The dispute arose when the Assessing Officer disallowed the interest claimed by the assessee as a deduction, arguing that the borrowings were not utilized for earning taxable income. However, the Appellate Assistant Commissioner reversed this decision, leading to an appeal by the Revenue before the Tribunal. The Tribunal, after considering the arguments, held that the interest in question was paid on borrowings raised to enable the members of the association to withdraw their funds and not for making investments to earn income. The Tribunal referred to previous decisions by the Madras High Court and the Supreme Court, emphasizing that the interest paid on borrowings for the purpose of enabling withdrawals, rather than for income generation, may not be allowable as a deduction. The Tribunal concluded that the Appellate Assistant Commissioner was unjustified in deleting the disallowance of interest in the three years under appeal. Despite a prayer for reference under section 256(1) of the Income-tax Act being turned down, a direction was given under section 256(2) to refer the question to the High Court. In the absence of the assessee during the proceedings, the court heard the learned counsel for the Revenue, who argued that the findings were factual and lacked a link with income generation, justifying the Income-tax Officer's disallowance of the interest claim. The court concurred with the Revenue's submission, stating that the Tribunal's conclusions were factual and did not give rise to any question of law. Consequently, the court declined to answer the question, and all three reference applications were returned unanswered.
|
