9911796707
|
Home
Issues Involved: Determination of whether the appellant qualifies as an investment company under section 109(ii) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 for the assessment year 1982-83, despite income from sources exceeding income from dealing in shares.
Summary: The Assessing Officer observed that the appellant's principal business was dealing in shares and that it had also sublet properties, leading to a conclusion that the appellant was not an investment company. The Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) disagreed, considering the appellant as an investment company. However, the Tribunal ruled in favor of the Revenue, stating that the appellant did not meet the conditions of an investment company as per section 109(ii) due to its income composition. The Tribunal upheld the Assessing Officer's order treating the loss from share dealing as speculation loss under section 73(1) with the Explanation. The appellant contended that it should be classified as an investment company under section 109(ii), but the court disagreed. Citing the Explanation to section 73, the court emphasized that the appellant's business loss exceeded income from other sources, making the Explanation applicable. Referring to a previous judgment, the court clarified that both profits and losses are considered in computing taxable income. Therefore, the court upheld the Tribunal's decision in favor of the Revenue and against the appellant. In conclusion, the court found no issue with the Tribunal's order and ruled in favor of the Revenue, disposing of the reference accordingly.
|
