Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + HC Income Tax - 2006 (12) TMI HC This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2006 (12) TMI 105 - HC - Income Tax

Issues involved:
The issue involves the jurisdiction of the Wealth-tax Officer at Agra to make an assessment due to the absence of a valid transfer of the case.

Jurisdiction of Wealth-tax Officer:
The case involved a situation where the Wealth-tax Officer at Agra conducted an assessment for the assessment year 1978-79, even though the assessee was an existing assessee at Delhi. The Appellate Commissioner declared the assessment as null and void, citing lack of jurisdiction by the Agra officer without following the prescribed procedure. The Income-tax Appellate Tribunal upheld this decision based on a similar case from the previous assessment year.

Legal Provisions and Analysis:
The Tribunal's decision was based on the principle that the assessee did not raise any objection to the jurisdiction of the Wealth-tax Officer during the assessment proceedings. The Tribunal referred to the provisions of section 124 of the Income-tax Act, which limits the time frame for questioning the jurisdiction of the Assessing Officer. As the assessee voluntarily filed the return and did not object to the jurisdiction during the assessment process, it was deemed that the assessee had accepted the jurisdiction of the Agra officer.

Court Decision:
The High Court upheld the decision in favor of the Revenue, stating that the assessee's lack of objection during the assessment process implied acceptance of the Agra officer's jurisdiction. Therefore, the Tribunal's decision was deemed incorrect in this context. The question referred to the court was answered in the negative, supporting the Revenue's position. No costs were awarded in this matter.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates