Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Wealth-tax Wealth-tax + HC Wealth-tax - 2000 (11) TMI HC This

  • Login
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2000 (11) TMI 76 - HC - Wealth-tax


Issues:
1. Valuation of unquoted equity shares for Wealth-tax Rules, 1957
2. Inclusion of compulsory deposit amount in taxable wealth

Valuation of unquoted equity shares for Wealth-tax Rules, 1957:
The case involved a Hindu undivided family holding unquoted shares in companies. The dispute arose regarding the reduction of provision for taxation by the amount of advance tax payable under section 210 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, while valuing the unquoted equity shares for the purpose of rule ID of the Wealth-tax Rules, 1957. The Inspecting Assistant Commissioner rejected the contention of the assessee, but the Commissioner of Wealth-tax (Appeals) ruled in favor of the assessee. On appeal, the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal held that the provision for taxation should not be reduced by the advance tax paid by the company when computing the value of unquoted shares. The court referred to the case of Bharat Hari Singhania v. CWT, emphasizing the validity and applicability of rule ID for valuing unquoted equity shares. It was held that the rule must be followed in all cases, and as no alternative method was prescribed, the provision for taxation should not be reduced by the advance tax paid. The reference was answered against the assessee and in favor of the Revenue.

Inclusion of compulsory deposit amount in taxable wealth:
The second issue pertained to whether the amount in the compulsory deposit scheme account should be included in the taxable wealth of the assessee. Citing the case of V. M. Rao v. CWT, which established that the amount in the compulsory deposit account qualifies as an 'asset' under the Wealth-tax Act, the court determined that the amount standing to the credit of the assessee in the compulsory deposit scheme account falls within the definition of 'property' under the Act. Therefore, the amount in the compulsory deposit account should be treated as an asset and included in the taxable wealth of the assessee. The reference was answered against the assessee and in favor of the Revenue.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates