9911796707
|
Home
Issues involved: Interpretation of section 41(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 regarding deletion of unclaimed credit balances from total income.
Summary: The High Court of Delhi was tasked with determining whether the Tribunal was justified in deleting a sum of Rs. 26,803 brought to tax by the Income-tax Officer under section 41(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The dispute revolved around the treatment of unclaimed credit balances during the assessment proceedings for the year 1976-77. The Assessing Officer held the amounts taxable under section 41(1) as they were deleted from the total income. The Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) noted that some amounts were not debited in earlier years and could not be taxed, while others remained credited to the profit and loss account indicating a remission of liability. The Tribunal ruled that unilateral transfer to the profit and loss account did not signify cessation of liability, hence not assessable under section 41(1). The Revenue argued that the apex court's decision in CIT v. T. V. Sundaram Iyengar and Sons Ltd. supported taxing the amount under section 41(1), as it changed character to the assessee's own money. Consequently, the court answered the question in the negative, favoring the Revenue. This judgment clarifies the application of section 41(1) concerning unclaimed credit balances and the criteria for taxing such amounts based on the change in character to the assessee's own money. The court emphasized the significance of entries in the profit and loss account in determining remission of liability and upheld the Revenue's position supported by the apex court's decision.
|
