1975 (7) TMI 142 - HC - VAT and Sales Tax

Summary

Issues Involved:

1. Validity of reassessment and penalty on a dissolved firm.
2. Retrospective application of Section 19-A of the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 1959.
3. Interpretation of validation provisions in the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax (Amendment) Act, 1968.

Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

1. Validity of Reassessment and Penalty on a Dissolved Firm:

The petitioner, a dissolved partnership firm, contended that the reassessment orders and penalties for the assessment years 1963-64, 1964-65, and 1965-66 were invalid as they were issued after the firm's dissolution. The petitioner relied on the Supreme Court decision in *State of Punjab v. Jullundur Vegetables Syndicate*, which held that without a statutory provision, a dissolved firm cannot be assessed. The Appellate Assistant Commissioner rejected this contention, citing sections 15, 19, and 53(c) and (d) of the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 1959, and rule 40 of the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Rules, which allowed for the assessment of dissolved firms. The Tribunal, however, did not address this issue directly, focusing instead on the merits of the case. The High Court examined the retrospective insertion of Section 19-A by the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax (Amendment) Act, 1968, which allowed for the assessment and penalty on dissolved firms as if no dissolution had occurred.

2. Retrospective Application of Section 19-A of the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 1959:

Section 19-A, introduced retrospectively from April 1, 1959, enabled the assessment of dissolved firms and held all partners jointly and severally liable for tax, penalty, or other amounts. The High Court noted that legislatures have the power to enact laws retrospectively, especially in tax matters, to validate previously invalid assessments by removing the basis of their invalidity. The court referenced several Supreme Court decisions, including *Janapada Sabha, Chhindwara v. Central Provinces Syndicate Ltd.*, which upheld the principle that retrospective amendments could validate past tax levies.

3. Interpretation of Validation Provisions in the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax (Amendment) Act, 1968:

The petitioner argued that while Section 19-A allowed for the assessment and penalty on dissolved firms, the validation provision in Section 5 of the amending Act only validated "all taxes levied or collected" and did not explicitly include penalties. The High Court, however, found it unnecessary to decide whether the term "taxes" included penalties, as the proceedings were pending before the Tribunal when the amending Act was enacted. Since the amending provision had retrospective effect, the Tribunal was bound to apply Section 19-A as if it had always been in force. The court cited *State of Maharashtra v. Champalal Kishanial Mohta* and *Jaipuria Brothers Ltd. v. State of U.P.* to support the view that retrospective amendments apply to pending proceedings.

Conclusion:

The High Court concluded that both the assessment and the levy of penalty on the dissolved firm were legal and valid under the retrospective application of Section 19-A. The orders of the Tribunal were upheld, and the petitions were dismissed with costs. The court emphasized that the retrospective amendment validated the previously invalid assessments and penalties, ensuring compliance with the amended statutory provisions.