1977 (2) TMI 114 - HC - VAT and Sales Tax

Summary

Issues involved: Interpretation of tax exemption u/s 38 of Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act for sale of iron and steel products.

Summary:
The High Court of Madras heard a revision petition by the State challenging the Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal's decision regarding the tax liability on the sale of iron and steel products. The Tribunal found that the goods sold by the assessee, including M.S. rounds, angles, and squares, fell under the category of "iron and steel" and were exempt from tax. However, the State contended that each item should be considered a separate commercial commodity for taxation purposes, even if they originated from the same source. The Court analyzed the relevant entry in the Second Schedule of the Act and concluded that only M.S. rounds were entitled to tax exemption as they retained their identity as the original commodity. On the other hand, M.S. angles and squares were considered different commercial commodities and not eligible for exemption based on the tax paid on the M.S. rounds. The Court emphasized the importance of retaining the identity of goods as a particular commercial commodity for tax exemption purposes.

The Court rejected the respondent's argument that goods must only be in the same category or entry to qualify for exemption, emphasizing that the key factor is the retention of the goods' identity as a specific commercial commodity. The Court referred to a Supreme Court decision highlighting the distinction between separate commercial commodities and the production process. Additionally, the Court discussed a previous Supreme Court ruling regarding the separation of cotton seeds from unginned cotton, emphasizing that once goods are transformed into a different commodity, they are no longer exempt from tax based on the original commodity's tax payment.

In conclusion, the Court allowed the tax revision petition, setting aside the Tribunal's order. The matter was remanded to the Tribunal to separate the turnover related to the sale of M.S. rounds for tax exemption, while the turnover for M.S. angles and squares would not qualify for exemption. The Court ruled in favor of tax exemption for M.S. rounds due to their retention of identity as the original commodity, while other products were considered distinct commercial commodities.