9911796707
|
Home
Issues Involved:
1. Disallowance of wages paid in cash. 2. Disallowance of telephone expenses. Detailed Analysis: 1. Disallowance of Wages Paid in Cash Facts and Contentions: - The assessee, a proprietor of M/s. Safeguards, engaged in supplying manpower, filed a return declaring an income of Rs. 38,80,071 for the assessment year 2006-07. - The assessee paid wages amounting to Rs. 12.61 crores, with Rs. 36,00,341 paid in cash. - The Assessing Officer (AO) noted discrepancies in the attendance register and salary receipt register, particularly differences in signatures, and disallowed the cash payments as bogus expenses supported by fabricated documents. - The assessee explained that due to operational constraints, employees often collected salaries on behalf of their colleagues, leading to differences in signatures. The assessee also provided evidence of statutory compliance and reimbursement by clients. Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) Findings: - The Commissioner (Appeals) observed that the cash payment of salary constituted only 2.86% of the total salary expenditure. - The Commissioner accepted the assessee's explanation regarding discrepancies in signatures and the operational necessity of cash payments. - The Commissioner upheld a partial disallowance of Rs. 1 lakh, considering the minor nature of discrepancies. Tribunal's Analysis: - The Tribunal noted that the assessee's business model involved reimbursement from clients based on attendance records maintained by both the assessee and clients. - The Tribunal found the AO's reasons for disallowance (irregular attendance register and signature discrepancies) inadequate. - The Tribunal emphasized that the discrepancies were minor and adequately explained, and that the AO failed to find any substantial evidence of non-genuine expenses. - The Tribunal deleted the entire disallowance, including the Rs. 1 lakh upheld by the Commissioner (Appeals), affirming that there was no finding that such expenses were not incurred for business purposes. 2. Disallowance of Telephone Expenses Facts and Contentions: - The assessee incurred telephone expenses totaling Rs. 17,67,132, with the AO disallowing 10% of these expenses. - The assessee contended that only Rs. 7,875 pertained to the residential telephone, while the rest were for office use or mobile allowances for employees. Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) Findings: - The Commissioner (Appeals) reduced the disallowance from 10% to 5%. Tribunal's Analysis: - The Tribunal reviewed the details and found that Rs. 12.25 lakhs were mobile telephone allowance arrears paid to employees, and Rs. 4.39 lakhs were for mobile connections provided to employees. - The Tribunal concluded that these amounts could not be considered personal expenses. - The Tribunal upheld a disallowance of Rs. 10,000, considering the remaining expenses for office and residential telephones. Conclusion: - The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeal and partly allowed the assessee's cross-objection. - The Tribunal's order was pronounced in the open court on December 18, 2009.
|
