Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + AT Income Tax - 2010 (2) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2010 (2) TMI 991 - AT - Income Tax

Issues Involved:
The judgment by Appellate Tribunal ITAT AHMEDABAD involved the appeal by the Revenue against the order of the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) regarding the treatment of entrance fees and other expenses for the assessment year 2006-07.

Entrance Fees Issue:
The main issue in the Revenue's appeal was whether the entrance fees received by the assessee club should be considered as "capital receipt" or "revenue receipt." The Assessing Officer viewed entrance fees as "revenue receipt" based on certain judgments, while the assessee argued that entrance fees were capital receipts, citing the judgment of the Bombay High Court in CIT v. W. I. A. A. Club Ltd. The Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) followed the Tribunal's earlier decision in favor of the assessee and deleted the addition of entrance fees.

Cross-Objection Grounds:
In response to the appeal, the assessee filed a cross-objection raising several grounds. The first ground related to the deduction of deferred expenses, which the Commissioner disallowed. The second ground concerned the addition under section 40(a)(ia) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, which the Commissioner confirmed. The third ground was about the disallowance of loss on sale of assets, and the fourth ground was regarding the disallowance of gratuity payment. The Tribunal decided to restore some matters to the Assessing Officer for further verification.

Decision Summary:
The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner's decision to treat entrance fees as capital receipts, following the Tribunal's earlier order. The cross-objection by the assessee was partly allowed for statistical purposes, with certain grounds being restored to the Assessing Officer for clarification. The appeal of the Revenue was dismissed, and the order was pronounced on February 5, 2010.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates