9911796707
|
Home
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
1979 (2) TMI 185 - HC - VAT and Sales Tax
Issues:
1. Calculation of limitation period for rectification of assessment order under section 22 of the U.P. Sales Tax Act. The judgment by the Allahabad High Court dealt with a case where the assessee, engaged in the business of ready-made garments and iron netting, contested the calculation of the limitation period for rectification of an assessment order for the assessment year 1967-68. The primary contention was whether the limitation for making an application under section 22 should be counted from the date of the assessment order or from the date of its communication to the assessee. The court analyzed the language of section 22(1) and compared it with other provisions like sections 9 and 10, which explicitly mention counting the limitation from the date of service of the order. The court referred to a Supreme Court judgment regarding the interpretation of limitation periods in similar contexts. The court held that the limitation for filing an application under section 22 begins to run from the date when the order is communicated to the assessee or when the assessee had the opportunity to know the order fully. The court rejected the argument that the limitation should start from the date of the order passed by the assessing authority. The court also discussed previous decisions of the High Court related to the limitation period for filing a revision under the Income-tax Act, emphasizing that the limitation period should start from the date of communication of the order. Consequently, the revision was dismissed, and no costs were awarded. In conclusion, the judgment clarified the interpretation of the limitation period for rectification of assessment orders under section 22 of the U.P. Sales Tax Act, emphasizing that the limitation starts running from the date of communication of the order to the assessee. The court's decision was based on the language of the relevant provisions, Supreme Court precedent, and the consistent interpretation of limitation periods in similar legal contexts.
|
