9911796707
|
Home
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
1983 (2) TMI 259 - HC - VAT and Sales Tax
Issues:
Challenge to reassessment notices under Central Sales Tax Act and Punjab General Sales Tax Act for sale of rice bran oil in inter-State trade and commerce. Analysis: The petitioner, a firm selling rice bran oil in inter-State trade, filed a writ petition seeking to quash reassessment notices issued by the Assessing Authority under the Central Sales Tax Act and Punjab General Sales Tax Act. The petitioner contended that no new information justifying reassessment had come to light after the initial assessment for the years 1978-79, 1979-80, and 1980-81. The Assessing Authority relied on a letter stating that rice bran oil was considered inedible and should be taxed at 4% instead of the 1% rate previously applied to edible oils. The petitioner argued that the letter did not provide factual information on their sales and that the opinion regarding the inedibility of rice bran oil was formed after the assessments. The court found that there was no new material indicating under-assessment, rendering the reassessment notices illegal and without jurisdiction. The court also addressed the question of whether rice bran oil was edible or inedible, noting the lack of detailed information on the constituents of the oil in the case file. The court emphasized that without a clear understanding of which components rendered the oil inedible, a conclusive determination could not be made. However, due to the primary finding on the lack of new material for reassessment, the court did not delve further into this issue. Furthermore, the court considered the authority of the Excise and Taxation Commissioner to issue the letter guiding the Assessing Authorities on the tax treatment of rice bran oil. Despite reservations raised by the petitioner's counsel, the court deemed it unnecessary to rule on this matter in light of the main contention regarding the validity of the reassessment notices. The court concluded by allowing the writ petition, quashing the impugned notices dated 24th February, 1982, without imposing any costs on the petitioner.
|
