Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases VAT and Sales Tax VAT and Sales Tax + HC VAT and Sales Tax - 1984 (10) TMI HC This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

1984 (10) TMI 210 - HC - VAT and Sales Tax

Issues involved: Interpretation of transactions involving replacement of parts during warranty period and pre-delivery charges under the M.P. General Sales Tax Act.

Replacement of parts during warranty period: The reference made by the President of the Board of Revenue questioned whether amounts reimbursed by the manufacturing company for replacement of parts during the warranty period constitute transactions of sale u/s the M.P. General Sales Tax Act. The assessee, a dealer of automobiles, argued that the replacement of spare parts during the warranty period, reimbursed by the manufacturer, does not amount to a sale but is part of the sale price of the vehicle. Citing a Supreme Court decision, the assessee contended that tax had already been charged on the sale price of the vehicle, and therefore, the reimbursement should not be taxed. The High Court agreed, stating that the dealer merely passes on parts from the manufacturer to the customer, and the transaction does not fall within the definition of "sale" under the Act.

Pre-delivery charges: The dispute also involved pre-delivery expenditure incurred by the dealer on damaged parts during transit, which was reimbursed by the manufacturer. The revenue contended that these charges constitute a sale of parts to the manufacturer and are therefore taxable. However, the High Court disagreed, stating that the dealer's role is to deliver vehicles in a salable condition on behalf of the manufacturer, and any reimbursement for pre-delivery charges does not amount to a sale. The Court held that both the replacement of parts during the warranty period and pre-delivery charges transactions do not fall within the definition of "sale" under the Act and are not liable to tax.

Conclusion: The High Court ruled that transactions involving reimbursement for parts supplied during the warranty period and pre-delivery charges do not constitute sales under the M.P. General Sales Tax Act and are not subject to tax. The Court directed the parties to bear their own costs in the matter.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates