Pricing Login

Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice : Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding

For Sales / Support:
WhatsApp

9911796707

Case Laws Acts Notifications Circulars Classification Forms Manuals Articles News D. Forum Highlights Notes

TMI - e-Newsletter TaxTMI Goods matched documents like e-way bill and... TaxTMI NRI's unexplained mutual fund investment & capital... TaxTMI Land sale profit: Business income or long-term... TaxTMI Lending business earned interest spread, no... TaxTMI Money laundering case: Balancing PMLA bail... TaxTMI Export of service partly performed outside India... TaxTMI Technical testing firm wins CENVAT credit case;... TaxTMI Excess Input Tax Credit penalty appeal dismissed... TaxTMI Transport agency's bundled services disqualify it... TaxTMI Taxman overreached by turning limited scrutiny into... TaxTMI Genuine anonymous donations not taxable. Grants not... TaxTMI Property investment source verification not valid... TaxTMI Income Tax Assessment Notice Issued by... TaxTMI Freight charges paid to foreign shipping co. not... TaxTMI Massive financial fraud via sham deals to launder... TaxTMI Latest Case-Laws TaxTMI Latest Notifications + Circulars TaxTMI GST Council Decisions TaxTMI

Follow us:

Home Case Index All Cases VAT and Sales Tax VAT and Sales Tax + HC VAT and Sales Tax - 1988 (7) TMI HC This

Login
Summary

Forgot password New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo

1988 (7) TMI 386 - HC - VAT and Sales Tax

The High Court of Rajasthan allowed the revision filed under the Rajasthan Sales Tax Act, 1954, stating that tin containers sold separately from hydrogenated vegetable oil should be taxed at 3% as packing material, not 7%. The Court directed a fresh assessment of sales tax on the packing material. (Case citation: 1988 (7) TMI 386 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT)

← Previous Next →

Quick Updates:

What's New:
Latest Case Laws

What's New:
Latest Notifications

What's New:
Latest Circulars

F: GST on Solar Plant

F: ITC on Inward supplies availed in the next Financial Year

F: GST AUDIT U/S 65 AND SHOW CAUSE U/S 73

A: ELECTRONIC CASH LEDGER

A: CENVAT credit can be claimed for telecom infrastructure

A: RECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN GST

A: ITC on Telecommunication Towers: Bharti Airtel (SC) implication in GST...

F: RMC ON FRIGHT

F: RCM on Rent for Exempted Commodity

N: Amendment in Notification No. 18/2021-Customs (ADD), dated the 27th Ma...

H: Penalty on concealment deleted due to lack of evidence of deliberate u...

H: Company's expenses disallowed, but no penalty as details disclosed; Tr...

H: Resolving Arbitral Tribunal's Mandate Extension: Supreme Court Allows ...

H: Court allows appeal against retrial order for evidence forgery; uphold...

H: Provisions restricting input tax credit on goods/services for construc...

H: Tax Penalty Notice Defects: Grounds Must Be Clear.

H: Taxpayer gets relief under tax dispute resolution scheme despite pendi...

H: Lack of jurisdiction for AO to invoke Sec 153C without receiving mater...

H: Writ challenging assessment dismissed; assessee availed remedy of appe...

H: Income from house property additions - ALV capped at Rs.8.39L for 2015...

H: Fraudulent employee mishandling led to embezzlement loss deductible u/...

H: Taxpayer challenges legality of vague penalty notice - CIT(Appeals) om...

H: Tax-free dividend income, interest-free funds disallowance relaxed, TD...

H: Property renovation costs wrongly disallowed; Revenue authorities over...

H: Charity trust's registration wrongly denied, court orders re-evaluatio...

A: PENALTY ON DIRECTORS CONTRAVENING EXPORT REGULATIONS UNDER FOREIGN EXC...

A: Difference between “License” and “Royalty”

A: Penalty proceedings under Section 130 of the CGST Act cannot be initia...

C: Guidelines to Stock Exchanges, Clearing Corporations and Depositories

T: Supreme Court Upholds Validity of Re-Assessment Notices Issued During ...