9911796707
|
Home
Issues involved: Determination of whether income from sale of plants grown directly in pots and sale of seeds can be treated as agricultural income under section 2(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
Judgment Summary: Plants Grown in Pots: The Tribunal found that the plants were not grown directly in pots but were transplanted after various operations carried out on the land. The assessee, operating a nursery, propagated plants using methods like layering, gootying, inarching, cutting, and hybridization. The Tribunal concluded that the activities involved preparing seedlings scientifically and growing plants on prepared beds before transplanting them into containers for sale. The primary source of the plants was the mother plant, requiring human labor and energy. The Revenue argued that growing plants in pots, regardless of the duration, cannot be considered agricultural operations, citing a previous case. However, the Supreme Court's definition of agriculture includes basic and subsequent operations fostering plant growth, which encompassed the activities of the assessee. The plants sold in pots were deemed products of agriculture involving human skill and effort. Sale of Seeds: Regarding the sale of seeds, it was noted that seeds cannot exist without mother plants, which were grown on land. The Revenue did not dispute that the seeds were a product of cultivation by the assessee. The seeds were considered agricultural products, and the income derived from their sale was classified as agricultural income. The court ruled in favor of the assessee, stating that both the sale of plants grown in pots and seeds constituted agricultural income under the Income-tax Act, 1961. The assessee was awarded costs amounting to Rs. 1,500. This judgment clarifies the scope of agricultural income in relation to plant cultivation and seed sales, emphasizing the importance of human effort and land cultivation in determining agricultural operations for tax purposes.
|
