1991 (10) TMI 284 - AT - VAT and Sales Tax

Issues Involved:

1. Disallowance of exemption claims under Section 5(1) of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956.
2. Interpretation of the Indian and foreign contracts.
3. Applicability of the "integral connection" test.
4. Applicability of Section 5(1) and Section 5(3) of the CST Act.
5. Definition and applicability of "crossing the customs frontiers of India."
6. Transfer of documents of title to goods after crossing customs frontiers.
7. Retrospective application of Section 2(ab) of the CST Act.

Detailed Analysis:

1. Disallowance of Exemption Claims under Section 5(1) of the CST Act:

The applicants challenged the disallowance of their claims for exemption from tax under Section 5(1) of the CST Act. The claims were related to sales to the State Trading Corporation (STC) for export purposes. The Tribunal examined whether the sales by Indexport to STC could be considered as sales in the course of export.

2. Interpretation of the Indian and Foreign Contracts:

The Tribunal analyzed the provisions of the Indian contract between Indexport and STC and the foreign contract between STC and the Russian buyer. The Indian contract stipulated that Indexport would supply goods to STC for shipment to the foreign buyer, with STC acting as the intermediary.

3. Applicability of the "Integral Connection" Test:

The Tribunal referred to the Supreme Court's "integral connection" test, which requires a direct and inextricable link between the sale and the export. The Tribunal concluded that there was no such integral connection between the Indian contract and the actual export, as the sale to STC did not directly occasion the export.

4. Applicability of Section 5(1) and Section 5(3) of the CST Act:

The Tribunal held that the sale by Indexport to STC did not qualify for exemption under the first limb of Section 5(1) of the CST Act. The Tribunal also noted that Section 5(3) of the CST Act, which provides for exemption of penultimate sales, was not applicable as the assessments in question were for periods before its enactment.

5. Definition and Applicability of "Crossing the Customs Frontiers of India":

The Tribunal examined the definition of "crossing the customs frontiers of India" as per Section 2(ab) of the CST Act. The Tribunal held that this definition, which was enacted in 1976, could not be applied retrospectively to the periods in question.

6. Transfer of Documents of Title to Goods after Crossing Customs Frontiers:

The Tribunal rejected the contention that the sale by Indexport to STC was effected by the transfer of documents of title to the goods after crossing the customs frontiers. The Tribunal noted that the property in the goods passed to STC when the goods were delivered on board the vessel, which occurred before crossing the customs frontiers.

7. Retrospective Application of Section 2(ab) of the CST Act:

The Tribunal disagreed with the view that Section 2(ab) of the CST Act was retrospective in operation. The Tribunal held that the definition of "crossing the customs frontiers of India" could not be applied to transactions that took place before its enactment.

Conclusion:

The Tribunal dismissed the application, holding that the applicants were not entitled to exemption from tax under Section 5(1) of the CST Act. The Tribunal found no integral connection between the sale by Indexport to STC and the actual export, and the sale did not qualify as a sale in the course of export. The Tribunal also rejected the retrospective application of Section 2(ab) of the CST Act. No order was made as to costs.

← Previous Next →