9911796707
|
Home
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
1997 (12) TMI 632 - HC - VAT and Sales Tax
Issues:
Interpretation of transactions as stock transfer or inter-State sales for tax purposes, imposition of penalty for incorrect return filing. Analysis: The case involved the assessment of transactions by an assessee-company during the assessment year 1988-89, where the company claimed that certain transactions were "stock transfer to its branch of Palghat for open market sales" and not subject to tax. However, the assessing officer treated these transactions as inter-State sales and imposed tax due to the absence of "C" forms. Additionally, a penalty at 150% of the tax due was imposed for filing an incorrect and incomplete return under relevant tax acts. Upon appeal, the Appellate Assistant Commissioner disagreed with the company's claim of stock transfer and upheld the assessing officer's view of inter-State sales, along with confirming the penalty. Subsequently, the Tamil Nadu Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal found most transactions to be inter-State sales, except for despatches to three specific traders, which were considered as stock transfers to the branch and not taxable under CSTA. The penalty was reduced to 50% of the tax due by the Tribunal. Two separate actions were taken: one by the company challenging the disallowed exemption claim and penalty, and the other by the Revenue challenging the allowed branch transfer claim and penalty reduction. The main point for consideration was whether the Tribunal's order was legally sustainable based on the facts of the case. The High Court analyzed the transactions and concluded that all despatches from the head office to identifiable buyers in Kerala constituted inter-State sales, rejecting the Tribunal's view on stock transfers. The Court referenced the Sahney Steel case to support this interpretation. Regarding the penalty, it was deemed unjustified as the company had disclosed all transactions, albeit claiming exemption incorrectly. Thus, the penalty was set aside, and both tax case revisions were disposed of without costs.
|
