2003 (9) TMI 758 - HC - VAT and Sales Tax

Issues Involved:
1. Justification of the Tribunal in excluding the purchase turnover of prawns from tax under section 5(1) of the CST Act.
2. Justification of the Tribunal in holding that sale was effected by transfer of documents of title to the goods after the goods crossed the customs frontiers of India.

Issue-wise Analysis:

1. Justification of the Tribunal in excluding the purchase turnover of prawns from tax under section 5(1) of the CST Act:

The Tribunal's decision to exclude the purchase turnover of prawns from tax under section 5(1) of the CST Act was based on the interpretation of the agreements between the assessee and the export house. The Tribunal noted that the assessee, a registered exporter, undertook exports of marine products through agreements with export houses. The export houses procured foreign orders and negotiated prices, while the assessee handled procurement, processing, packing, customs clearance, and shipping of the goods. The Tribunal observed that the goods and documents of title were transferred on board the ship beyond the customs frontiers of India, satisfying the conditions of section 5(1) of the CST Act.

The Tribunal also referred to section 2(ab) of the CST Act and other provisions of the Customs Act, 1962, concluding that the goods crossed the customs frontiers of India when they were loaded on board the ship. The Tribunal relied on the Supreme Court decision in B.K. Wadeyar, Sales Tax Officer v. Daulatram Rameshwarlal [1960] 11 STC 757, which supported the view that the sale was effected by a transfer of documents of title to the goods after the goods crossed the customs frontiers of India. Thus, the Tribunal held that the assessee satisfied the conditions of section 5(1) and was entitled to exemption under section 5(3) of the CST Act.

2. Justification of the Tribunal in holding that sale was effected by transfer of documents of title to the goods after the goods crossed the customs frontiers of India:

The Tribunal's conclusion that the sale was effected by transfer of documents of title to the goods after the goods crossed the customs frontiers of India was based on the specific clauses in the agreement between the assessee and the export house. Clause (12) of the agreement indicated that the export house procured the marine products in the course of export on board the ship outside the customs frontiers of India. The Tribunal noted that the goods were taken to Cochin Port, cleared by customs authorities, and loaded on board the ship by the assessee. The bill of lading was obtained in the name of the assessee, and the documents of title were transferred to the export house after the goods were on board the ship.

The Tribunal observed that the documents of title to goods belonged to the assessee until the moment the goods were loaded on the ship and beyond the customs frontiers of India. The Tribunal concluded that the sale was effected by a transfer of documents of title to the goods after the goods crossed the customs frontiers of India, satisfying the second limb of section 5(1) of the CST Act.

Conclusion:

The High Court noted that the Tribunal's decision was based on the interpretation of section 5(1) of the CST Act without considering the legal principles laid down by the Supreme Court in K. Gopinathan Nair v. State of Kerala [1997] 105 STC 580 and C.T. Ltd. v. Commercial Tax Officer [1997] 104 STC 94. The Court observed that the Tribunal's approach could not be sustained, and the matter needed to be reconsidered by the assessing authority in light of the Supreme Court decisions.

The High Court set aside the Tribunal's order and remitted the matter to the assessing authority for de novo consideration of the assessee's claim for exemption under section 5(3) of the CST Act. The assessing authority was directed to pass fresh orders within three months, considering any other relevant Supreme Court decisions presented by the assessee. The tax revision cases were allowed to this extent.

← Previous Next →