9911796707
|
Home
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2006 (11) TMI 609 - AT - VAT and Sales Tax
Issues:
Challenge to rejection of application for enhancement of gross value of fixed capital assets under rule 149(4) of West Bengal Sales Tax Rules, 1995. Analysis: The petitioner, a manufacturing unit registered under West Bengal Sales Tax Act, 1994, sought to enhance the gross value of fixed capital assets by Rs. 3,08,05,680 through an application under rule 149(4) of the 1995 Rules. The Assistant Commissioner rejected the application on grounds of the investment being for expansion, not eligible under the rule. The petitioner appealed, leading to a remand and subsequent rejection by the Assistant Commissioner again. The petitioner argued that the investment was not for expansion but additional investment in the existing unit, thus eligible for remission under the 1994 Act and rule 149(4). However, the State Representative contended that the investment was indeed for expansion, supported by findings during a visit and certificates indicating increased production capacity. Section 43A of the 1994 Act imposed restrictions on incentives for certain industrial units post-January 1, 2000. The petitioner's unit ceased to be small-scale upon expansion and was registered under the West Bengal Incentive Scheme, 2000. The judgment highlighted the distinction of the 2000 Scheme from previous ones and the exclusion of expansion from certain benefits under the Act. The Tribunal found that the investment was indeed for expansion, supported by documentary evidence and the rejection by the Assistant Commissioner. The petitioner failed to provide contradictory evidence. Consequently, the Tribunal upheld the rejection, stating the petitioner was not entitled to the enhancement under rule 149(4) and in accordance with section 43A of the 1994 Act. In conclusion, the Tribunal disposed of the application without costs, concurring with the decision of the Assistant Commissioner. The Chairman and Judicial Member also agreed with the decision, leading to the dismissal of the petitioner's appeal.
|
