9911796707
|
Home
Issues:
1. Interpretation of section 13(1)(bb) of the Income-tax Act for exemption eligibility. 2. Applicability of section 13(1)(bb) to business held under trust. 3. Assessment of interest on investment of surplus funds under appropriate head. 4. Validity of considering withdrawn grounds by the Tribunal. Analysis: Issue 1: Interpretation of section 13(1)(bb) for exemption eligibility The case involved questions regarding the applicability of section 13(1)(bb) of the Income-tax Act for exemption under section 11. The Assessing Officer contended that the amendment to section 13(1)(bb) disallowed exemption unless the business was carried out in line with the primary object of the institution. However, the Appellate Tribunal relied on a Supreme Court decision, holding that the assessee was entitled to exemption under section 11 despite the amendment. The court agreed with the Tribunal's interpretation, emphasizing that the primary purpose of carrying out charitable objects justified the exemption. Issue 2: Applicability of section 13(1)(bb) to business held under trust The judgment also discussed a similar case before the Madras High Court, where it was held that a trust conducting business to fulfill charitable purposes was entitled to exemption under section 11, even after the insertion of section 13(1)(bb). The court agreed with the Madras High Court's reasoning, emphasizing that the business was incidental to carrying out charitable objects, and thus, the amendment did not disentitle the trust from exemption under section 11. Issue 3: Assessment of interest on investment of surplus funds Regarding the assessment of interest on investment of surplus funds, the Assessing Officer classified it as business income, but the Appellate Tribunal disagreed. The Tribunal held that interest on non-business deposits should be taxed under "Other sources" and not as income from the business of running kuries. The court concurred with the Tribunal's view, stating that interest from accumulated funds should be taxed under "Other sources." Issue 4: Validity of considering withdrawn grounds The Tribunal faced criticism for considering withdrawn grounds after the assessee's counsel gave up one of the grounds. The court clarified that there is no estoppel against law, and the counsel's statement did not impact the assessee's consistent claim for exemption under section 11. The court held that all questions should be answered in favor of the assessee, emphasizing the importance of the consistent claim for exemption. In conclusion, the court ruled in favor of the assessee on all issues, emphasizing the importance of the primary charitable purpose in determining exemption eligibility under section 11 despite the presence of section 13(1)(bb) in the Income-tax Act.
|
