9911796707
|
Home
Issues:
1. Refund of tax on self-assessment income. 2. Effect of setting aside regular assessment on self-assessment tax refund. Analysis: The petitioner, a partner in a firm, filed returns for the years 1975-76 and 1976-77 declaring net incomes and paid taxes accordingly. The Income-tax Officer later assessed the firm's income higher than declared. The Commissioner of Income-tax set aside the additions made by the Income-tax Officer. The petitioner sought a refund of the tax paid for the years in question. The main issue was whether tax paid on self-assessment income should be refunded. Section 140A of the Income-tax Act deals with self-assessment, requiring tax payment before submitting the return based on admitted income. The court clarified that setting aside the regular assessment does not nullify the self-assessment. The tax paid on self-assessment income is not refundable even if additions in regular assessment are set aside. The court cited precedents to support its decision. The Allahabad High Court ruled that tax paid towards provisional assessment retains its character if the regular assessment is void. The Punjab and Haryana High Court held that setting aside a regular assessment does not affect the provisional assessment. The Gujarat High Court emphasized that tax paid under section 140A is considered 'assessed tax' and not dependent on regular assessment. The court noted that the Commissioner found the original assessments were set aside only concerning the additions made, not the self-assessment tax. Consequently, the court upheld the Commissioner's decision to retain the tax paid on self-assessment income. The petition seeking a refund was dismissed.
|
